search for: eatmydata

...n the existing testcases (to verify everthing is working fine), It says 3 out of the six testcases fails. Here is the report of the test cases. "... make check-TESTS make[5]: Entering directory `/home/saad/GitProjects/xapian/build/xapian-core/tests' Running test './apitest' under eatmydata and valgrind Running tests with backend "none"... ./apitest backend none: All 85 tests passed. Running tests with backend "inmemory"... Running test: topercent2...FAIL: apitest Running test './internaltest' under eatmydata and valgrind PASS: internaltest Running test...

...erthing is working fine), It says 3 out > of > > the six testcases fails. Here is the report of the test cases. > > > Running tests with backend "inmemory"... > > Running test: topercent2...FAIL: apitest > > > Running test './queryparsertest' under eatmydata and valgrind > > Running test: qp_spell1...FAIL: queryparsertest > > > Running test './termgentest' under eatmydata and valgrind > > Running test: tg_spell1...FAIL: termgentest > > Is this with git master (if not, what version of Xapian)? > > No its not with...

...commands that you asked me to run. All these commands were executed in order. Commands: make remove-cached-databases rm -rf .chert .glass .multichert .multiglass .replicatmp .stub Command:./runtest ./apitest --verbose topercent2 Output: Running test './apitest --verbose topercent2' under eatmydata and valgrind Running tests with backend "none"... Running tests with backend "inmemory"... Running test: topercent2... Command: ls -R .chert Output: .chert: db=apitest_simpledata .chert/db=apitest_simpledata: flintlock You ought to have a database in .chert/db=apitest_simpled...

...e size of the email got bigger than 40kb so i had to place the output as text. If I do not run "make remove-cached-databases" and run "./runtest ./apitest --verbose topercent2" the second time then the output is " Running test './apitest --verbose topercent2' under eatmydata and valgrind Running tests with backend "none"... Running tests with backend "inmemory"... Running test: topercent2... DatabaseOpeningError: Couldn't detect type of database ./apitest backend inmemory: 0 tests passed, 1 failed. Running tests with backend "glass"......

...ld > be able to pin down the cause (though it's likely to take a while as it > took about 45 minutes to fail). Just to update the status of this - I now have a C++ reproducer, and have found that the transaction isn't needed to reproduce this. It also still reproduces when run under eatmydata [1], and together these bring the time to reproduce down to 4-5 minutes. Still longer than ideal, but quick enough to start making some progress on narrowing down what's happening. Cheers, Olly [1] https://www.flamingspork.com/projects/libeatmydata/

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 08:16:23PM +0000, Olly Betts wrote: > Just to update the status of this - I now have a C++ reproducer, and > have found that the transaction isn't needed to reproduce this. It > also still reproduces when run under eatmydata [1], and together these > bring the time to reproduce down to 4-5 minutes. Still longer than > ideal, but quick enough to start making some progress on narrowing > down what's happening. I was intending to finish analysing this and address it for 1.4.6, but once I found the MSet::sni...

Hello, Since the migration to xapian 1.4.X and the migration to Glass, i've recurrent database corruption errors. I've to reindex my database to make it works again. > DatabaseCorruptError: Expected block 200713 to be level 2, not 1 Theses problems always occur after this error: > xapian.DatabaseCorruptError: Db block overwritten - are there multiple writers? I've

...gt;powers and the more yourself personally into each and every stop. But >it doesn't scale Huh? Scripting that creation from scratch is a job done once that scales very well. debootstrap is reasonably fast, installation of additional packages can be fast as well (since it?s a new image, use eatmydata or the dpkg option I?ve not yet remembered). And, given the system?s all-new, I believe this is even more reliable than cloning something customised, then trying to adapt *that* to the new requirements. >, and you will eventually be told to stop wasting your >time if your manager is attenti...

...blem, I wrote a small script which calls aptitude with the LD_PRELOAD libeatmyadata library. And now I want to share this idea (which is not my own, you can see several suggestion about that in the net) in order to collect suggestions and/or critics. For who which don''t know what is libeatmydata, the package info says: "This package contains a small LD_PRELOAD library (libeatmydata) and a couple of helper utilities designed to transparently disable fsync and friends (like open(O_SYNC)). This has two side-effects: making software that writes data safely to disk a lot quicker and ma...

Hi list, I don''t trust theoretical benchmarks that much and prefer "real-life benchs" on the occasion, so here''s mine: Given 4 laptops, the most powerful of which was running BTRFS and the others ext3 or ext4, all machines running Ubuntu 11.04 Natty 32-bit with a stock Ubuntu 2.6.38-11 kernel, all machines were given the following FS-intensive task : - Upgrade

...lf personally into each and every stop. But > >it doesn't scale > > Huh? Scripting that creation from scratch is a job done once that > scales very well. debootstrap is reasonably fast, installation of > additional packages can be fast as well (since it?s a new image, > use eatmydata or the dpkg option I?ve not yet remembered). I've been the guy who had to do it with large deployments, up to about 20,000 hosts of quite varied hardware from different vendors and different specs. I do believe they replaced my tools, after about 20 years. when someone found an effective open...

On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 2:51?PM Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser at tarent.de> wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, Keine Eile wrote: > > > does any one of you have a best practice on renewing ssh host keys on cloned > > machines? > > Yes: not cloning machines. Good luck with *that*. Building VM's from media is a far, far too lengthy process for production deployment,

While trying to run libguestfs tests after building with "--enable-appliance --with-supermin-extra-options=--use-installed", I ran into a peculiar error message in the c-api test: ,---- | libguestfs: error: strings: /abssymlink: strings: error while loading | shared libraries: libbfd-2.24-multiarch.so: cannot open shared object | file: No such file or directory `---- The problem here

Hi, I have 4 machines, all converted to BTRFS about 6 months ago, now all running Ubuntu Quantal with kernel 3.5.0-17 The matter is that all these machines are now getting slower and slower everyday, every disk access causing the disk to be 100% busy for long periods, to the point that I''m now seriously considering migrating everything back to ext4... From the start BTRFS was "not