search for: easiers

> We don't require users to compile their own gcc. Are you saying it's > impossible to get pre-built CMake 2.8.12 and gcc 4.7 on either Mac or > Windows? And we wouldn't be requiring it for cmake. My point was that cmake is always easier to install: * From binaries: a bit easier, since they are provided in http://www.cmake.org/ * From source: way easier than gcc. Gosh, from

Dear R Developers, A recommendation for future development. It would help if R scripts could be compiled into an executable, or a library. Speed is the main issue (I run a large scale monte carlo in R which is very slow). However, it would also make it easier to link R into other applications, easier at least than the COM infrastructure under Windows. Finally, it would make it much easier to

I agree with David's sentiment. The second method appears to be easier to follow. IMHO, this would be easier for external users that desire to modify the backend for their own custom extensions/instructions. On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 5:05 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk > wrote: > On 18 Aug 2017, at 10:55, Alex Bradbury <asb at asbradbury.org> wrote: >

> Pre-installed, or at all installable via packages. I don't think requiring a > new developer to build CMake before even checking out LLVM is wise. Why? We require recent compilers and installing a new cmake is easier (way easier if from source) than a new gcc. We already require it of every developer using windows or os X. By the same argument we should be providing xcode and msvc

Hi all, I have been playing with the AMI quite a bit lately - mostly debugging WombatDialer in production, but that's a different story - and I have been frustrated by the lack of a simple way to interact CLI-like with the AMI itself. So I have decided to write something myself to make my life easier, or at least a bit less miserable. The result is a little webapp that you can use as a sort

Dear R colleagues, is there an easier way to write R packages for the own use - without RTools and TeX? With R versions < 2.10.0 it was very easy to write a package. Under the path with the package name you wrote a description file and built some directories like "help", "html" and "R" with the special files in a "hand-operated" way. In the next step

Hi Are there any tools around that make rspec''s failure messages easier to read? unit_diff from ZenTest doesn''t seem to work - unless I missed something. A simple but very helpful improvement would be to use more line- breaks, e.g. Current output: expected "this is a very long string blah blah", got "this is a very very long string blah blah" (using

"Finkel, Hal J." <hfinkel at anl.gov> writes: > I think that it's really important that we're specific about the goals > here. Exactly what kinds of optimizations are we aiming to (more-easily) > enable? There certainly exists hardware with instructions that help > vectorize complex multiplication, for example, and having a builtin > complex type would

Hi. I think that the vorbis team should use this version of OggDrop RC3 as the official OggDrop RC3, because the menu interface is easier to use (& you can see what kind of mode you have chosen). http://www.inf.ufpr.br/~rja00/BQoggdropC1.zip See this thread for more info: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=4683 <p>I only have one problem now: what

Hi all, I open sourced a small project of mine recently. It is an EDSL for C++ which makes just-in-time compilation much easier to write and maintain. One of its backends is LLVM's OrcJIT (LLVM 7, still). https://github.com/tetzank/coat Here is a blog post of mine introducing the concept: https://tetzank.github.io/posts/coat-edsl-for-codegen/ You can see it as an abstraction layer on top

On Tue, 26 May 2020 00:43:41 +0200 uxio prego via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 25 May 2020, at 23:55, Wayne Davison via rsync > > <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > I've decided to give hosting it on github a try, especially since > > there's been a lot of nice contributions lately. Hopefully this > > will make it

Adam Nemet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > I spent some time chatting with Adam about this and have a better > understanding of his concerns here. It seems to me that if having > masking intrinsics is the long-term solution we want, we should do > that now (for add and sub) rather than building arbitrary matrix > layout info into

I have 'x' variables that I need to find the optimum combination of, with the constraint that the sum of all x variables needs to be exactly 100. I need to test all combinations to get the optimal mix. This is easy if I know how many variables I have - I can hard code as below. But what if I don't know the number of variables and want this to be a flexible parameter. Is there a sexy

Le 23/05/2018 à 10:32, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Wed, 23 May 2018 10:09:42 +0200 > Arnaud FLORENT via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> hi Roland >> >> >> thanks for your help >> >> it is easier to identify hosts with fixed adresses (ie allow/deny >> access by ip in firewall for example) > It might be easier to

*** *** WHAT WOULD MAKE R EASIER TO USE FOR YOU? *** The useR! 2017 conference in Brussels, July 4-7, will include a session in which attendees will be invited to offer their thoughts in at least three areas: * A common interface for similar functions. For example, John C. Nash and others have taken the lead in developing packages to provide one standard call that will

Hi Andres, A topic that I'd find interesting is what it'd take to make it easier to > use profile guided optimization in the context of JIT. A few years back > I crudely hacked this together, but it was fairly ugly. It'd be nice to > make that easier. Possibly too complicated for that type of session? We couldn't go into detail, but we could kick off a discussion and

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3209 Bug ID: 3209 Summary: Make overriding RemoteCommand on the cli easier Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.3p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

a <- c(1:10) b <- c(.5, .6, .9, 10, .4, 3, 4, 9, 0, 11) d <- c(21:30) z <- data.frame(a,b,d) library(fields) results <- c() for(i in 1:(length(rownames(z))-1)){ results[i] <- rdist(z[i,], z[(i+1),]) } results.1 <- data.frame(results) f <- rownames(z) r <- f[-1] rownames(results.1) <- r colnames(results.1) <- f[1] this does what I want it to do - is

I've decided to give hosting it on github a try, especially since there's been a lot of nice contributions lately. Hopefully this will make it easier for both the people sending patches as well as for me to snag the changes. I'll continue to push changes to the samba git as well. Here's the new repo: https://github.com/WayneD/rsync Feel free to open issues there, but we

Yes, SVE can vectorize early exit loops by using speculative (first-faulting) loads, which essentially give a predicate of the lanes loaded successfully. For uncounted loops with these special loads, the loop predicate tests can be done using a 'ptest' instruction, checking if the last element is active. Amara On 3 February 2017 at 10:15, Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk>