search for: earmarked

Hi, I need to run a .reg file. In windows, I think I'd just double click on it. If I try to run it in wine, it says it's not a valid executable. How do I run it?

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 06:24:16PM -0400, TomK wrote: >On 4/12/2016 5:08 PM, John Ferlan wrote: >> Having/using a root squash via an NFS pool is "easy" (famous last words) >> >> Create some pool XML (taking the example I have) >> >> % cat nfs.xml >> <pool type='netfs'> >> <name>rootsquash</name> >>

...#39;re just about to hit 5.5 years since 1.2.0 was released. And that's really much too long - we've built up a pile of nice new features which it's hard for most people to use. There are still rather a lot of tickets marked for consideration for this development series - currently 23 earmarked for 1.3.4, 7 for 1.3.4 and 38 for 1.3.x (though 1.3.x is more "suitable for doing in 1.3.x" than "we want to do for 1.3.x"). I think we need to acknowledge that these aren't going to all get done, and we're much better off keeping a sensible interval between new release...

...uot; package OF BOTH LIKEWISE-NAMED ONES first on that very Linux system so that upon importing and unpacking the .gz.zip file containing the corresponding package from a trustable source (CRAN) the latter step (import+unpacking of the compressed file) could at all bear fruits in that THE SAME-NAME EARMARKED R PACKAGE would operate on the R-hosting Linux system at all?[4] I have to admit that which ran through my mind and materialised as item [3] of this email could appear confusing; the "fear" of not being able to use an R functionality on my Linux OS without enabling the latter to allow for...

...years since 1.2.0 was released. > > And that's really much too long - we've built up a pile of nice new > features which it's hard for most people to use. > > There are still rather a lot of tickets marked for consideration for > this development series - currently 23 earmarked for 1.3.4, 7 for 1.3.4 > and 38 for 1.3.x (though 1.3.x is more "suitable for doing in 1.3.x" > than "we want to do for 1.3.x"). > > I think we need to acknowledge that these aren't going to all get done, > and we're much better off keeping a sensible inte...

I wanted to post publicly my problem with Jonathan's proposed album requirements. Although I do apologize, since this thread is too big already. The idea that as a requirement one should be able to identify the exact CD a track was ripped from is not a valid requirement in my book (not for the tags at least), and I hope I can explain why. Without knowing the exact way Jonathan wishes to

Let's try this from scratch: I've been having a problem for the past several days with a shellscript that has been working without problems for the 11 months. It's working until the comes up with the following error: total: matches=349 tag_hits=4061 false_alarms=1 data=6628073 ERROR: file corruption in public_html/reports/analog/analog.conf. File changed during transfer?

On 04/13/2016 09:23 AM, TomK wrote: > On 4/13/2016 1:33 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 06:24:16PM -0400, TomK wrote: >>> On 4/12/2016 5:08 PM, John Ferlan wrote: >>>> Having/using a root squash via an NFS pool is "easy" (famous last >>>> words) >>>> >>>> Create some pool XML (taking the example I

On 04/12/2016 03:55 PM, TomK wrote: > > On 4/12/2016 3:40 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> [ I would be way easier to reply if you didn't top-post ] >> >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:07:50PM -0400, TomK wrote: >>> Hey John, >>> >>> Hehe, I got the right guy then. Very nice! And very good ideas but I >>> may need more time to reread

On 4/12/2016 5:08 PM, John Ferlan wrote: > > On 04/12/2016 03:55 PM, TomK wrote: >> On 4/12/2016 3:40 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> [ I would be way easier to reply if you didn't top-post ] >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:07:50PM -0400, TomK wrote: >>>> Hey John, >>>> >>>> Hehe, I got the right guy then. Very

On: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:27:02 -0500, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > I STILL do not understand why anyone would care what CentOS does > with money donated by people who used the product and wanted to > donate. > > If we were having wild beer parties every week ... as long as the > packages are built, compared, signed, and released on time, what >

On 4/13/2016 10:00 AM, John Ferlan wrote: > > On 04/13/2016 09:23 AM, TomK wrote: >> On 4/13/2016 1:33 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 06:24:16PM -0400, TomK wrote: >>>> On 4/12/2016 5:08 PM, John Ferlan wrote: >>>>> Having/using a root squash via an NFS pool is "easy" (famous last >>>>> words)

Ok i've comment in between de debug logs.   Check my comments and add the needed info.   Van: Ian Coetzee [mailto:samba at iancoetzee.za.net] Verzonden: woensdag 10 april 2019 10:17 Aan: L.P.H. van Belle CC: samba at lists.samba.org Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] chown: changing ownership of 'test': Invalid argument Hi Louis, Thank you. I will add those line and test. Will revert