Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "earm".
Did you mean:
arm
2013 Dec 09
3
[LLVMdev] ARM EABI and modulo
Hi all,
one issue found during the NetBSD/ARM tests is the following.
Consider this input for EARM:
int f(int a, int b) { return a % b; }
unsigned int g(unsigned int a, unsigned int b) { return a % b; }
At the moment, this will call __modsi3 and __umodsi3, even though those
functions are not part of AAPCS. Should this be considered a lowering
bug in the ARM target?
Joerg