Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "early_forward_exception".
2020 Feb 11
0
[PATCH 35/62] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler
...de <linux/mm.h>
#include <asm/trap_defs.h>
@@ -28,6 +31,9 @@ struct ghcb boot_ghcb_page __bss_decrypted __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);
*/
struct ghcb __initdata *boot_ghcb;
+/* Runtime GHCBs */
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_DECRYPTED(struct ghcb, ghcb_page) __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);
+
/* Needed in early_forward_exception */
extern void early_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr);
@@ -133,6 +139,23 @@ static bool __init setup_ghcb(void)
return true;
}
+void encrypted_state_init_ghcbs(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ if (!sev_es_active())
+ return;
+
+ /* Initialize per-cpu GHCB pages */
+ for_each_possible_cpu...
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi,
here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run
under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete,
but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the
size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial
feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code
here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi,
here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run
under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete,
but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the
size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial
feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code
here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.