search for: earger

...n. > That is why it is difficult to justify supporting Whidbey. This bug may > have been easy to work around. The next one may not be so easy. > Remember, if Whidbey wasn't buggy and incomplete, you'd be paying around > $1000 for it instead of downloading it for free. Too earger to get LLVM running. Really I should have checked things out deeper. I thought Whidbey would really be upto the job, obviously not. I have ordered a copy of Visual Studio 2003 now anyway so can work with that. The CVS changes may probably want rolling back ? Jeff, as I say if I can work with/u...

GCC is smart enough to realize it doesn't return. That's because the declaration of abort() is decorated with __attribute__((__noreturn__)). So is GCC smarter than VC++? As it turns out, in VC++ the declaration of abort() is decorated with __declspec(noreturn). Whidbey is not stricter than 2003, it is merely buggier. VC++ has always complained about functions failing to return a

...difficult to justify supporting Whidbey. This bug >> may have been easy to work around. The next one may not be so easy. >> Remember, if Whidbey wasn't buggy and incomplete, you'd be paying >> around $1000 for it instead of downloading it for free. > > > Too earger to get LLVM running. Really I should have checked things > out deeper. > I thought Whidbey would really be upto the job, obviously not. Well, we don't know until someone tries. > > I have ordered a copy of Visual Studio 2003 now anyway so can work > with that. > > The C...