Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "eal3".
Did you mean:
eal
2005 Jan 15
1
Guide to stripping Centos 3
...fstype ext3 --size=1024 --grow --ondisk=hda
part swap --size=128 --grow --maxsize=256 --ondisk=hda
# basically a unconfigured server - the new 2005 Centurion
%packages
kernel
elinks
grub
joe
lftp
lynx
rdate
rpm-build
rsync
yum
# kdebase
-apmd
-autofs
-centos-yumcache
-comps
-cups
-cups-libs
-eal3-certification
-eal3-certification-doc
-finger
-freetype
-ipsec-tools
-iptables
-iptables-ipv6
-irda-utils
-iscsi-initiator-utils
-isdn4k-utils
-krb5-libs
-krb5-workstation
-krbafs-utils
-kernel-pcmcia-cs
-libwvstreams
-mdadm
-mgetty
-mtr
-nano
-nfs-utils
-pam_krb5
-pam_smb
-parted
-portmap
-raidtoo...
2012 Feb 01
3
Configuration Compliance auditing for many CentOS 5.x boxes
...ow I am looking for a way to generate a report of server compliance
with some compliance standard for all the boxes regularly.
We have a basic list of configuration settings, that is a weaker form of
various compliance recommendations, so I am confident that most
compliance benchmarks like CIS, EAL3 or the linux web STIG level would
be sufficient.
We have chef installed on the CentOS instances, hence I can push out yum
based packages, (and I can install from source tarballs, but it will
make me cry, on these instances)
I Would like to have... a tool that runs locally on each CentOS box a...
2004 Sep 20
1
centos 3.3 and updates for 3.1
...A-2004-283.html
crash: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2004-264.html
cups: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-449.html
cvs: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-346.html
dhcp: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-330.html
diskdumputils: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2004-261.html
eal3-certification: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2004-366.html
ethtool: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-250.html
evolution-connector: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2004-290.html
file-roller: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-351.html
fontconfig: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHB...
2003 Aug 11
5
realpath(3) et al
First, I hope that this message is not considered flame bait. As someone
who has used FreeBSD for for 5+ years now, I have a genuine interest in
the integrity of our source code.
Second, I hope that this message is not taken as any form of insult or
finger pointing. Software without bugs does not exist, and I think we all
know that. Acknowledging that point and working to mitigate the risks