Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "eaed1c3b".
2013 Feb 23
0
[LLVMdev] -Os
At one of the BOFS during the llvm conference a few years back, one of
the Apple managers stated in effect that their view of -Os was to get
some modest savings but only if performance has near 0 impact.
On 02/23/2013 09:45 AM, Reed Kotler wrote:
> On 02/23/2013 04:28 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
>> Hi Reed,
>>
>> -Os could do with some love. It is more or less the same set
2013 Feb 23
3
[LLVMdev] -Os
On 02/23/2013 04:28 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
> Hi Reed,
>
> -Os could do with some love. It is more or less the same set of passes as -O2, but with a few things that are most likely to increase code size removed. We have had problems with it in the past for FreeBSD's bootloader. By tweaking the set of default passes added for -Os, I got the size down by about 20%, but I didn't