search for: ea9c776

Hi, I'm working on a target which have a variable size for CC (the same size as the arguments). As a result getSetCCResultType, return a variable size. In this commit, at the line DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(SetCC, DL, SelectVT), on my target, you end up generating the Node you are replacing, and so creating a loop in the DAG, which give a whole new meaning to the A in the acronym. Subsequent code

...ResultType is i64 for i64, and i32 for i32, so using the type > of the sext created i64 (setcc (i32 x) (i32 y)) which doesn't work > > -Matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140705/ea9c776e/attachment.html>