search for: e9jmznce

Hi all! Attached a three part series which implements the very first bits of my GSoC proposal (full proposal is here http://pastebin.com/e9JMZNCE), for some preliminary review. -- Sanjoy Das http://playingwithpointers.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Adds-relevant-command-line-options.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 2021 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/piper...

Hi! Thanks for the feedback. For context, my implementation plan is here: http://pastebin.com/e9JMZNCE First, about unwinding: In architectures like x86-64, where unwinding based on DWARF info, there shouldn't be any problems; since the DWARF info will be emitted correctly. Otherwise, if the unwinding is done by following BP, it should still be possible to have BP de-reference correctly (ref....

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for the feedback. For context, my implementation plan is here: > http://pastebin.com/e9JMZNCE > > First, about unwinding: > > In architectures like x86-64, where unwinding based on DWARF info, there > shouldn't be any problems; since the DWARF info will be emitted > correctly. Otherwise, if the unwinding is done by following BP, it > should still be possible to have...

...n Holewinski < justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Sanjoy Das < > sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Thanks for the feedback. For context, my implementation plan is here: >> http://pastebin.com/e9JMZNCE >> >> First, about unwinding: >> >> In architectures like x86-64, where unwinding based on DWARF info, there >> shouldn't be any problems; since the DWARF info will be emitted >> correctly. Otherwise, if the unwinding is done by following BP, it >> shou...

...gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Sanjoy Das >> <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Thanks for the feedback. For context, my implementation plan is here: >>> http://pastebin.com/e9JMZNCE >>> >>> First, about unwinding: >>> >>> In architectures like x86-64, where unwinding based on DWARF info, there >>> shouldn't be any problems; since the DWARF info will be emitted >>> correctly. Otherwise, if the unwinding is done by follow...

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Talin wrote: > > I wonder - would something like this allow for multiple stacks for a single > thread? I'm thinking of something like continuations / fibers / green > threads, which would be very handy. > > > I haven't looked at the proposal, but

On Apr 10, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Talin wrote: > I wonder - would something like this allow for multiple stacks for a single thread? I'm thinking of something like continuations / fibers / green threads, which would be very handy. I haven't looked at the proposal, but yes, this would be very useful functionality for LLVM to provide. -Chris > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:07 AM,