Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "e8dafd6a".
2008 Dec 29
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
On Dec 27, 2008, at 8:54 PM, Talin wrote:
> Although I haven't actually tried Boost.Test, I kind of figured that
> this would be the case - that you pretty much have to drink the "Boost
> Kool-Aid" in order to use it.
I agree, boost.test seems like a non-starter from many reasons.
>> So are you planning on maintaining whatever test system, or just have
>> them
2008 Dec 29
3
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
...pers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
--
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081229/e8dafd6a/attachment.html>
2008 Dec 28
4
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
Mark Kromis wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Misha Brukman wrote:
>> 2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com>
>> Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or a
>> different test suite?
>> I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar with
>> that. So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it