search for: e8ca789

>> maybe current infrastructure used for eh/debug info emission can be >> extended to handle ocaml data? > > Perhaps. I'm pretty sure the code to generate this stuff doesn't belong in > LLVM proper like DWARF support does, though; this is not even a vague > approximation of a standard. :) >From your original email: >The biggest problem is a data

Thanks for the quick reply, Anton. On 2007-08-12, at 16:43, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Gordon. > > Just a quick thinko (that's why I'm sending this e-mail personally): No problem. I hope you don't mind me redirecting back to the list, though… > maybe current infrastructure used for eh/debug info emission can be > extended to handle ocaml data? Perhaps.

...code generation as a runtime option; this improves the possibility that a patch would be accepted, and otherwise makes patch maintenance manageable. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070813/e8ca789e/attachment.html>