Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "e83b246b".
2009 Jul 16
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] CodeEmitter Memory Foot Reduction
...s transparent to the higher levels
of DOE and JIT.
The old design was the best design it just needed an extend() method.
Aaron
>
> -Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090716/e83b246b/attachment.html>
2009 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] CodeEmitter Memory Foot Reduction
On Jul 16, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
>
> I understand that you say that, but I can't bring myself to care at
> this point. Have you thought about how many cycles are already used
> to produce the instructions that lead to the emission of those 10K
> bytes? The total percentage of time spent doing these virtual calls
> will be tiny compared to the total