search for: e7708c65

+1, some sort of defined process is definitely needed. In particular I think there should be a guideline for when the backend has been reviewed "enough" before it can be committed. -Matt

...no time nor inclination to thoroughly review every new back-end. When enough is enough and it's OK to press "commit" button? Yours, Andrey -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160729/e7708c65/attachment.html>

Folks, In recent discussions about accepting the Lanai back-end as official (built by default), there was the idea that we should have some official guidelines, if not rules, that all targets must (should?) follow when requesting to be added upstream, and later, to be officially supported. Here's a list of what more or less converged into the thread with my personal bias. Must haves to be