Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "e7572deb".
2010 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization? 2.0
...esult.getValue(2);
ReplaceUses(SDValue(N, 1), Result);
}
return NULL;
}
ISD::MUL is set to be expanded.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100910/e7572deb/attachment.html>
2010 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization? 2.0
On Sep 9, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Borja Ferrer wrote:
> Hello, i've noticed a new possible missed optimization while testing more trivial code.
> This time it's not a with a xor but with a multiplication instruction and the example is little bit more involved.
>
> C code:
>
> typedef short t;
> t foo(t a, t b)
> {
> t a4 = a*b;
> return a4;
> }
>
2010 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization? 2.0
Hello, i've noticed a new possible missed optimization while testing more
trivial code.
This time it's not a with a xor but with a multiplication instruction and
the example is little bit more involved.
C code:
typedef short t;
t foo(t a, t b)
{
t a4 = a*b;
return a4;
}
argument "a" is passed in R15:R14, argument "b" in R13:R12, the return value
is stored in