search for: e7007681

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "e7007681".

Did you mean: 007681
2016 May 25
0
Runtime interception: design problem
Dear Pierre, Stepping up a level, what is your goal in replacing calls to malloc() and free()? Is it any different than what SAFECode, SoftBound, or ASan do? Regards, John Criswell On 5/25/16 8:05 AM, Pierre Gagelin via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am having troubles but this shouldn't be hard to solve for many > people here. I am beginning a runtime feature for the
2016 May 26
1
Runtime interception: design problem
...> John Criswell > Assistant Professor > Department of Computer Science, University of Rochesterhttp://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/criswell > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160526/e7007681/attachment.html>
2016 May 25
4
Runtime interception: design problem
Hi everyone, I am having troubles but this shouldn't be hard to solve for many people here. I am beginning a runtime feature for the BoundsChecking pass and I want to replace the libc malloc&free. I followed the design of AddressSanitizer (Asan) and tried to use the INTERCEPTOR macro from the interception.h file of compiler-rt library. Here is the problem. The file I modify