search for: e6873212

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "e6873212".

Did you mean: 96843212
2015 Jan 31
1
[LLVMdev] unwind's permanent residence
...extra information. For triples that we know for a fact use libgcc as the system unwinder it would make sense to have that target's default be libgcc. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150131/e6873212/attachment.html>
2015 Jan 31
0
[LLVMdev] unwind's permanent residence
On 1/31/15 5:36 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 31 Jan 2015, at 03:02, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote: >> Talked it over with Saleem on IRC, and I've come around to thinking libunwind is a better default for --rtlib=compiler-rt. Reason being that --rtlib=compiler-rt means libgcc probably isn't even available. > > It's not just that, it's about making
2015 Jan 31
3
[LLVMdev] unwind's permanent residence
On 31 Jan 2015, at 03:02, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote: > Talked it over with Saleem on IRC, and I've come around to thinking libunwind is a better default for --rtlib=compiler-rt. Reason being that --rtlib=compiler-rt means libgcc probably isn't even available. It's not just that, it's about making it self-contained. In a system with both gcc and llvm