search for: e6510

...s were tested > > in this same hardware with different results, it could be very useful > > to repeat the tests with 6.03-pre19 too, which includes some patches > > for (l)pxelinux. > > > > Feedback is appreciated. > > lpxelinux from 6.03-pre20 works for my DELL E6510. > > Philipp > @Philipp, By any chance, have you tested 6.03-pre19 too? Is there any difference (regression, performance, etc.) between 6.03-pre19 and 6.03-pre20 in this particular hardware? TIA, Ady.

...> in this same hardware with different results, it could be very useful >>> to repeat the tests with 6.03-pre19 too, which includes some patches >>> for (l)pxelinux. >>> >>> Feedback is appreciated. >> >> lpxelinux from 6.03-pre20 works for my DELL E6510. > > @Philipp, By any chance, have you tested 6.03-pre19 too? Is there any > difference (regression, performance, etc.) between 6.03-pre19 and > 6.03-pre20 in this particular hardware? I didn't notice any difference between pre19 and pre20: lpxelinux.0 works with http://, but p...

...is out. Since several prior versions were tested > in this same hardware with different results, it could be very useful > to repeat the tests with 6.03-pre19 too, which includes some patches > for (l)pxelinux. > > Feedback is appreciated. lpxelinux from 6.03-pre20 works for my DELL E6510. Philipp

> Hello, > > On 24.07.2014 17:32, Gene Cumm wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: > >> On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: > >>> As expected. You have a different OUI (the first 3 octets of the MAC > >>> address). Try everything from 6.03-pre18 and then lpxelinux.0 from > >>>

Hello, I have a problem with our DELL E6510 notebooks (BIOS version A05): 1. After the update from syslinux-3.71 to 4.02 LOCALBOOT no longer works. I've read <http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Hardware_Compatibility#LOCALBOOT_on_Dell_Latitude_E6400> and neither version works. The behavior differs between the laptop rebooting...

...re with different results, it could be very useful >>>> to repeat the tests with 6.03-pre19 too, which includes some patches >>>> for (l)pxelinux. >>>> >>>> Feedback is appreciated. >>> >>> lpxelinux from 6.03-pre20 works for my DELL E6510. >> >> @Philipp, By any chance, have you tested 6.03-pre19 too? Is there any >> difference (regression, performance, etc.) between 6.03-pre19 and >> 6.03-pre20 in this particular hardware? > > I didn't notice any difference between pre19 and pre20: lpxelinux.0 >...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57081 Priority: medium Bug ID: 57081 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: dell latitude laptop E6510 with nouveau and nvs3100 nvidia doesn't resume properly QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: karolszk at gmail.com Hardware: x86 (IA32)...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57151 Priority: medium Bug ID: 57151 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: repeatable nouveau driver crashes/hangs during resume on Dell Latitude E6510 when drm.debug=14 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: critical Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: karolszk at gmail.com Hardware: x86 (IA32) Status: NEW Version: 7.6 (2010.12) Co...

> Is there something I can test or help to diagnose? What about 6.03-pre18 (or newer)? http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/Testing/ git.zytor.com/?p=syslinux/syslinux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master Regards, Ady.

...hn.dev.49232: UDP, length 1412 > > Philipp > FWIW, you have not mentioned specifically updating to BIOS version A11 before trying A15. From: www.dell.com/support/home/us/en/19/Drivers/ DriversDetails?driverId=60M0Y&fileId=3379268220&osCode=BIOSA&productCo de=latitude-e6510&languageCode=EN&categoryId=BI [quote] Important Information 1. Please note that if the A01 BIOS is currently installed on your system you must first apply the P02 patch (E6510P02.EXE) before upgrading to this BIOS. 2. Please note that if the A08 or before A08 BIOS is currently inst...

...have not mentioned specifically updating to BIOS version > A11 before trying A15. I started with A05, updated to A10, then A11 and now A15. > <http://www.dell.com/support/home/us/en/19/Drivers/DriversDetails?driverId=60M0Y&fileId=3379268220&osCode=BIOSA&productCode=latitude-e6510&languageCode=EN&categoryId=BI> ... > So P02, A09, and A11 seem to be EACH a MUST. As the notebook started with A05, P02 should be irrelevant. > Regarding the speed, is there any difference between pxelinux.0 and > lpxelinux.0? I tried lpxelinux.0, but it fails to resolve th...

Hello, On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: >> PS: <http://www.zytor.com/~genec/lpxelinux-6.03p18g3.tgz> did not work. > > As expected. You have a different OUI (the first 3 octets of the MAC > address). Try everything from 6.03-pre18 and then lpxelinux.0 from > here:

Hello, On 24.07.2014 17:32, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: >> On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> As expected. You have a different OUI (the first 3 octets of the MAC >>> address). Try everything from 6.03-pre18 and then lpxelinux.0 from >>> here:

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: > Hello, > > On 23.07.2014 22:46, Alexander Perlis wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Philipp Hahn wrote: >>> [...] >>> I tried lpxelinux.0, but it fails to resolve the gateway >>> address via ARP: >>> 17:25:51.399119 ARP, Request who-has 10.200.17.1 tell >>>

Hello, On 23.07.2014 15:07, Ady wrote: >> Is there something I can test or help to diagnose? > > What about 6.03-pre18 (or newer)? > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/Testing/ 6.03-pre18 is still slow: > 16:06:07.494125 IP dell.phahn.dev.49232 > xen12.phahn.dev.57501: UDP, length 4 > 16:06:07.494250 IP xen12.phahn.dev.57501 >

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: > Hello, > > On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: >>> PS: <http://www.zytor.com/~genec/lpxelinux-6.03p18g3.tgz> did not work. >> >> As expected. You have a different OUI (the first 3

Hi, I'm recently retired from my university job. I am looking for a laptop to run CentOS 6/7. My university was a traditional Dell site so I've used Latitude laptops for years, currently E6500/E6510. Anybody got any experience of running CentOS on the newer Dell Latitudes E5000 or E7000. These are not certified according to Redhats' Hardware Guide. Alternatively Precision Workstations would do. These can be supplied with Ubuntu installed so they run Linux. Thanks, Tony -- Linux nog...

On Tuesday 22 November 2016 18:32:14 Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/22/2016 07:23 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > I am looking for a laptop to run CentOS 6/7. My university was a > > traditional Dell site so I've used Latitude laptops for years, > > currently E6500/E6510. > > Dell's Linux laptops are listed here: > > http://www.dell.com/learn/us/en/555/campaigns/xps-linux-laptop?c=us > &l=en&s=biz > Been through the Dell site, I'm very familiar with Dell. The original question was whether anybody was running CentOS 6/7 on Del...

...gt; ii xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1 > > amd64 X.Org X server -- Nouveau display driver > > $ lspci |grep VGA > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GT218M [NVS 3100M] > > (rev a2) > > > > This is a Dell Latitude E6510, so not exactly bleeding edge. :) > > > > The system boots just fine, and I can use the laptop without issue. Goes to > > sleep just fine. When I resume from sleep, the display is black, and will > > not come to life (the back light is on, though). I can ssh in, and run all...

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie> wrote: > So any ideas. I may have missed this but what model laptop are we talking about? Brandon Vincent