Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "e64bfcb9702f".
2016 Feb 01
0
[PATCH v6 3/9] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
...asm/device.h
@@ -3,5 +3,9 @@
*
* This file is released under the GPLv2
*/
-#include <asm-generic/device.h>
+struct dev_archdata {
+ struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops;
+};
+struct pdev_archdata {
+};
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
index e64bfcb9702f..3249b7464889 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
@@ -11,11 +11,13 @@
#define DMA_ERROR_CODE (~(dma_addr_t) 0x0)
-extern struct dma_map_ops s390_dma_ops;
+extern struct dma_map_ops s390_pci_dma_ops;
static inline struct dma_map_ops *ge...
2016 Jan 29
18
[PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it?
To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Jan 29
18
[PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it?
To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 01
14
[PATCH v6 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it?
To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 01
14
[PATCH v6 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it?
To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 03
14
[PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it?
To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 03
14
[PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it?
To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too