search for: e5dfeedc

On 04/26/2013 04:20 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > > On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org > <mailto:slarin at codeaurora.org>> wrote: > >> Dan, >> Thank you for the quick and throughout reply. First paragraph pretty >> much sums it up. Unless there is more will to guaranty (or provide >> under flag) stricter version of IEEE

On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Dan, > > Thank you for the quick and throughout reply. First paragraph pretty much sums it up. Unless there is more will to guaranty (or provide under flag) stricter version of IEEE adherence, I doubt much can be done. > > So all of you with picky customers out there J Is there anyone

...correctly, especially given the current quality of LLVM's own optimizer for such code! =/ We should insulate ourselves from such concerns completely. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130428/e5dfeedc/attachment.html>