search for: e5a8a43bdcf8

...end to think it was: https://fosstodon.org/@gordonmessmer/110648143030974242 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tf_EkU3x2G0 ... and conversely, CentOS Stream is a much better stable LTS for self-supported systems than you might believe: https://medium.com/@gordon.messmer/in-favor-of-centos-stream-e5a8a43bdcf8 > 5. Red Hat's policy change contradicts the GPL's spirit. As you acknowledge, that's a subjective question.? I would say "no." I think the entire history of the free-as-in-speech vs free-as-in-beer clarification is proof that we wanted to ensure the right to improve...

Hi, As I found out yesterday, the fragmentation of the "Enterprise Linux" ecosystem just started to come true. I expect this is only the beginning and Red Hat may also start to completely hold back sources of non GPL software which is part of the "Enterprise Linux" ecosystem. I'm really wondering, how will this help anybody and how will this help Red Hat in the long run?

On 7/24/23 10:12, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-07-22 09:55, frank saporito wrote: >> On 7/22/23 02:29, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> From my point of view, Red Hat doesn't really sell software. They >>> give away software.? All of their software is available at no >>> charge, typically in an unbranded release.? What Red Hat sells is >>> support.

...odon.org/@gordonmessmer/110648143030974242 > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tf_EkU3x2G0 > > ... and conversely, CentOS Stream is a much better stable LTS for > self-supported systems than you might believe: > > https://medium.com/@gordon.messmer/in-favor-of-centos-stream-e5a8a43bdcf8 > > >> 5. Red Hat's policy change contradicts the GPL's spirit. > > > As you acknowledge, that's a subjective question.? I would say "no." > Seriously? You are the only person here who thinks that. The GPL grants the rights to redistribute source...