search for: e51

Hi, I'm playing with * for about 12 years now and since about 10 years, it's my home PBX. I can do pretty much everything I want but one thing I haven't managed yet... Mobile connection via bluetooth... I'm still using a Nokia E51 and the setup and everything works fine. However, on the second or third call, the incoming audio is noise. I have tried alignmentdetection=yes and also forcemaster but it doesn't make a difference. That's my bt-dongle: home:~ # hwinfo --bluetooth 02: USB 00.0: 11500 Bluetooth Device [C...

Hi, I have the following symptoms: Call X-lite / Nokia E51 X-lite press hold: Nokia DOES hear MOH Nokia press hold: X-lite does NOT hear MOH Call X-lite / SCCP phone MOH works as supposed Call SCCP phone / Nokia E51 SCCP press hold: Nokia DOES hear MOH Nokia press hold: X-lite does NOT hear MOH In addition, the BLF on the SCCP phones does NOT show the h...

...rch from web & also from Nokia site but they only mention this features as "VOIP call from wifi" they mentioed only this much info. they not mentioed info about inbulit SIP client to make voip calls without download any third party software. as per my search i found this 3 phones E51,E61i,E65 So Guys plz help me for this. Regards Amit -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080223/cb40da83/attachment.htm

I was browsing through the SAMBA workgroups defined here: E51-CAE, E51-WAAS, etc... everything looked fine (well, with the exception of subnet browsing) until I displayed the properties of the machines in the workgroups. Select a SAMBA host, right-click on the hostname and select 'Properties' from an NT4 machine displays the domain as "E51&qu...

Not to stir the pot, but I notice my email address has recently been harvested from this list for spamming purposes. This email address is unique and not used for anything else. I'd distinguish this from spam sent to the mailing list itself, which is obviously different. Is there anything further that could be done to prevent this? -- Dave

Hi, when I put a call on hold from my Nokia E51 (SIP client), the other side does NOT hear music on hold although sip debug / wireshark shows that the E51 tells the asterisk that it now holds the call. Canreinvite is set to "no". Also, when parking a call (features.conf), the parked caller does not hear music on hold. In queues, when...

...EDRClassone iSerial 0 bNumConfigurations 1 Mobile Phone: Nokia E51 Firmware: 400.34.011 26.05.2009 RM-244 Nokia E51 (05) OS: Slackware Linux (current) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32.5-smp #2 SMP Sat Jan 23 01:37:47 CST 2010 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux I've...

On 07/11/2017 14:18, Mathieu R. wrote: > Maybe i got no answer because there is an error which seem obvious in my > logs : > > Nov 4 20:57:55 vps81550 dovecot: auth: Fatal: sql: driver not set in > configuration file /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext This might sound silly, but in your doveconf you have: passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } Yet

Quoting dovecot-e51 at deemzed.uk: > Not to stir the pot, but I notice my email address has recently been > harvested from this list for spamming purposes. This email address is > unique and not used for anything else. > > I'd distinguish this from spam sent to the mailing list itself, which is &g...

...there. I have to hold the power button in for it to shut down. The same still occurs with a completed a fresh minimum install of Centos 6.4, installed the EPEL repo and did yum update. I'm running the latest bios for the motherboard, and even tried going back one version. MB: 785GM-E51 (MS-7596 1.2) CPU: AMD Phenom II x4 945 3ghz 1TB HD, 6 Gig Mem Any ideas? (Besides using a baseball bat - I am considering it) Here is some hardware info from the getinfo.sh script listed the forums. == BEGIN uname -rmi == 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 == END una...

On 02/12/2018 05:31, M. Balridge wrote: > Quoting dovecot-e51 at deemzed.uk: > >> Not to stir the pot, but I notice my email address has recently been >> harvested from this list for spamming purposes. This email address is >> unique and not used for anything else. >> >> I'd distinguish this from spam sent to the mailing...

On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 10:09:02AM +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > On 02/12/2018 05:31, M. Balridge wrote: > > > Quoting dovecot-e51 at deemzed.uk: > > > >> Not to stir the pot, but I notice my email address has recently been > >> harvested from this list for spamming purposes. This email address is > >> unique and not used for anything else. > >> > >> I'd distinguish this...

...42, NA reLeaveD<->reLeaveD, e43, NA reDeDR<->reDeDR, e44, NA reDopeNo<->reDopeNo, e45, NA reDopeleave<->reDopeleave, e46, NA reDopeDD<->reDopeDD, e47, NA reP3D<->reP3D, e48, NA reP3DA<->reP3DA, e49, NA reP3DD<->reP3DD, e50, NA reP3DRD<->reP3DRD, e51, NA reP3Equip<->reP3Equip, e52, NA reP3UC<->reP3UC, e53, NA reP3SP<->reP3SP, e54, NA reP3UM<->reP3UM, e55, NA reP3Abuse<->reP3Abuse, e56, NA reP3SB<->reP3SB, e57, NA reP3helmet<->reP3helmet, e58, NA reP1DADR<->reP1DADR, e59, NA reP1DRUG<->reP1DR...

...elect i1 %FC, double 0xDACBFCEAC1C99968, double 0xDACBFCEAC1C99968 %Cmp49 = fcmp ult double 0x9E8F85AE4F8D6C2C, 0x5A7FED9E637D2C1C br i1 %Cmp49, label %CF249, label %CF263 CF263: ; preds = %CF249 %L50 = load i64, i64* %Sl store i1 true, i1* %PC %E51 = extractelement <2 x i1> zeroinitializer, i32 0 br i1 %E51, label %CF249, label %CF259 CF259: ; preds = %CF259, %CF263 %Shuff52 = shufflevector <4 x i64> zeroinitializer, <4 x i64> zeroinitializer, <4 x i32> <i32 undef, i32...

...5 74a3 8203 5930 8203 55a0 0302 e.net...Y0..U... 0x0110: 0112 a103 0201 01a2 8203 4704 8203 439e ..........G...C. 0x0120: 0b55 e5e1 592a 3d8b f714 1658 e779 413a .U..Y*=....X.yA: 0x0130: 27ba 0a5c ab3d 7410 97e0 bc81 6ee7 ebbc '..\.=t.....n... 0x0140: f79c 57bf d6f0 026b e51e 0fd8 0d7c 5479 ..W....k.....|Ty 0x0150: 2015 e53d a42e a080 09e4 c5a4 a470 c576 ...=.........p.v 0x0160: 27d3 2bdb 3301 31fc 66c0 098e cd9a 666f '.+.3.1.f.....fo 0x0170: 2d85 976e 57d1 010e 22e6 d4a6 ce2b 5371 -..nW..."....+Sq 0x0180: 0c41 f955 20af 683f 9abe 90bf...

On pop3 logout, we're seeing log lines where the deleted count is blank (using default pop3_logout_format), so "del=%d/%m" is displaying in the logs as: "del=/1186" for example. In src/pop3/pop3-client.c:552: tab[4].value = client->delete_success ? dec2str(client->deleted_count) : 0; Shouldn't this be: tab[4].value =

On 19/07/2017 11:23, mj wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On 07/18/2017 11:43 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: >> i guess not, but typical bots arent using ssl, check it >> >> however fail2ban sometimes is to slow > > I have configured dovecot with > auth_failure_delay = 10 secs > > I hope that before the 10 sec are over, dovecot will have logged about the >

Has re-opening the logfiles broken between 2.2.32 and 2.2.33 releases? Using the same config that I've had for the past 10 or so point releases, /usr/bin/doveadm log reopen works perfectly up until 2.2.32, but with 2.2.33 (and .1 and .2) no new logfiles are created, file descriptors still have the original files open and keep writings to those logs. On an idling test instance, I get: master:

On 26/10/2017 19:33, David Zambonini wrote: > On 26/10/2017 18:38, Alexander Dalloz wrote: >> Am 26.10.2017 um 12:20 schrieb David Zambonini: >>> >>> There seems to be a bug with RFC822 processing in ltmp proxying that >>> doesn't >>> quote local parts that, for example, contain spaces. >> >> Newer related RFCs are RFC 5321 and 5322.

I have a situation where my LMTP RCPT TO: goes to a mailbox user account that does not reflect either the final (through aliasing) or envelope email address. SMTP RCPT TO: (envelope-local-part at envelope-domain) Final Recipient: (final-local-part at final-domain) LMTP RCPT TO: (mailbox-local-part at mailbox-domain) I'd like to use the final recipient as the vacation address, but also