Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "e4f7063a".
2014 Jun 22
2
[LLVMdev] Clarification on the backward compatibility promises
...t the
> bitcode is easier to version and keep compatible.
>
> -- Sean Silva
>
>
>> Cheers.
>>
>> Tim.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140621/e4f7063a/attachment.html>
2014 Jun 18
2
[LLVMdev] Clarification on the backward compatibility promises
On 18 June 2014 17:10, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Do others agree that this is the case or at least that this would be a
>> >> reasonable balance?
>> > IMO it's easier to be compatible on .ll level, no?
>>
>> That is not my experience with the bitcode format. The way the API is
>> structured makes it really easy