Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "e44fbe2".
Did you mean:
e44fbe2e
2012 Dec 03
1
[LLVMdev] [RFC] "noclone" function attribute
...sit pattern of that cost analysis. I haven't had time to
really make progress, in part because I don't (yet) have any particularly
good ideas....
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121202/e44fbe2e/attachment.html>
2012 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] "noclone" function attribute
On Dec 2, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> 3) Please change random parts of the compiler to use CodeMetrics, instead of scattering random checks for this attribute throughout the code. Anything duplicating code and not using CodeMetrics is just plain incorrect.
One problem that we may run into when using CodeMetrics is compile time. In many cases we
2012 Dec 03
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] "noclone" function attribute
On Dec 1, 2012, at 11:49 PM, "Kuperstein, Michael M" <michael.m.kuperstein at intel.com> wrote:
> I definitely support this.
>
> In fact we were about to send a very similar proposal. The main difference I can see between this proposal and ours was that we named the attribute "noduplicate".
> I graciously defer to James on the bikeshade color issue.
Yes,