search for: e3ec

...ecking the detailed of using debuglevel 10 I see this message: > > ../../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c:5583: Resolving > conflict record via existing-record rename 'CN=Vikas > Rajan,CN=Users,DC=SUB,DC=DOM,DC=TLDbg' -> 'CN=Vikas > Rajan\0ACNF:de5b7fa1-e3ec-4631-a8d7-cdfc137ac3b7,CN=Users,DC=SUB,DC=DOM,DC=TLD' That is what is known as a 'collision', at some time, the record was created on one machine, it possibly was a bit slow in replicating, so it was also created on another machine just at the same time as the replication arrived and t...

...ks for clarification. Checking the detailed of using debuglevel 10 I see this message: ../../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c:5583: Resolving conflict record via existing-record rename 'CN=Vikas Rajan,CN=Users,DC=SUB,DC=DOM,DC=TLDbg' -> 'CN=Vikas Rajan\0ACNF:de5b7fa1-e3ec-4631-a8d7-cdfc137ac3b7,CN=Users,DC=SUB,DC=DOM,DC=TLD' Although it was renamed and re-replicated: ../../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c:5605: With conflicting record renamed, re-apply replicated creation of 'CN=Vikas Rajan,CN=Users,DC=SUB,DC=DOM,DC=TLD' The whole transa...

...ecting to find. Does anyone know something about this? I've also seen that standard nvidiafb under linux does not try to do a similar test. Greeting, Alessandro -- Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici -Dr. Faustus - Marlowe Public GPG Key ID 0x650B3ED9 on subkeys.gpg.net Key Fingerprint 6243 AAD3 E3EC 52D8 DFAA 2A2F 9FCD 0457 650B 3ED9 Encrypted mails are welcome -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives...

...i everone, does anyone know about which registers are mapped at offset 0xC000 in MMIO? I'm an looking especially for regs 0xc014 and 0xc030 Greetings, Alessandro -- Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici -Dr. Faustus - Marlowe Public GPG Key ID 0x650B3ED9 on subkeys.gpg.net Key Fingerprint 6243 AAD3 E3EC 52D8 DFAA 2A2F 9FCD 0457 650B 3ED9 Encrypted mails are welcome -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives...

...ks for clarification. Checking the detailed of using debuglevel 10 I see this message: ../../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c:5583: Resolving conflict record via existing-record rename 'CN=Vikas Rajan,CN=Users,DC=SUB,DC=DOM,DC=TLDbg' -> 'CN=Vikas Rajan\0ACNF:de5b7fa1-e3ec-4631-a8d7-cdfc137ac3b7,CN=Users,DC=SUB,DC=DOM,DC=TLD' Although it was renamed and re-replicated: ../../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c:5605: With conflicting record renamed, re-apply replicated creation of 'CN=Vikas Rajan,CN=Users,DC=SUB,DC=DOM,DC=TLD' The whole transa...

On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 13:01:53 +0000 Peter Mittermayer via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > While resuming my testing for adding a new DC with higher Samba > version I have some questions: > > 1. do I have to expunge tombstones on each DC or just one (and > replication will remove it from others). - I think it should be run > on all DCs. > > 2. same question