search for: e3931e515906

...ied at redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/386628/ --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index 97ac662a47cb..e3931e515906 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c @@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, /* * We might need to add a TTM. */ - if (bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM && bo->ttm == NULL) { + if (bo->mem.mem_type == T...

Hi guys, I already tried this a few month ago, but since I don't have NVidia hardware its rather hard to test for me (need to get some ordered). Dave brought up the topic that we should probably try to move the handling into Nouveau once more, so I tried to fix the problem Ben reported and rebased on top of current drm-misc-next. Dave can you test this? At least in theory the approach

...depend on zero init base, offset and addr here. v2: init addr as well Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index e3931e515906..772c640a6046 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c @@ -650,6 +650,9 @@ static int ttm_bo_evict(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, evict_mem.mm_node = NULL; evict_mem.bus.io_reserved_vm = false; evict_mem.bus.io_reserved_count = 0; + evict_mem.bus.base = 0; +...

Hi guys, so I got some hardware and tested this and after hammering out tons of typos it now seems to work fine. Could you give it more testing? Thanks in advance, Christian