Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "e380664642b4".
2020 Aug 19
0
[PATCH v9 1/2] virtio: let arch advertise guest's memory access restrictions
...TFORM)) {
+ dev_warn(&dev->dev,
+ "device must provide VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ }
+
if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
index bb4cc4910750..e380664642b4 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
@@ -459,4 +459,13 @@ static inline void virtio_cwrite64(struct virtio_device *vdev,
_r; \
})
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS
+int arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access(void);
+#els...
2020 Aug 19
4
[PATCH v9 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
in this respin:
The tests are back to virtio_finalize_features.
No more argument for the architecture callback which only reports
if the architecture needs guest memory access restrictions for
VIRTIO.
I renamed the callback to arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access,
and the config
2020 Aug 31
3
[PATCH v10 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
The tests are back to virtio_finalize_features.
No more argument for the architecture callback which only reports
if the architecture needs guest memory access restrictions for
VIRTIO.
I renamed the callback to arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access,
and the config option to