Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "e33d9fe7".
2013 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Parallelize post-IPO stage.
On 7/17/13 4:12 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com
> <mailto:atrick at apple.com>> wrote:
>> The partitioning should be deterministic. It’s just that the linker
>> output now depends on the partitioning heuristics. As long that
>> decision is based on the input (not the host system), then it still
2013 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Parallelize post-IPO stage.
On Jul 14, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote:
> The partitioning should be deterministic. It’s just that the linker output now depends on the partitioning heuristics. As long that decision is based on the input (not the host system), then it still meets Eric’s requirements. I just think it’s unfortunate that post-IPO partitioning (or more generally, parallel
2013 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Parallelize post-IPO stage.
...g is to have only one MCWriter object and have all three partitions stream their content out through the one MCWriter, producing one object file.
-Nick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130717/e33d9fe7/attachment.html>