Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "e33b0d69".
2013 Feb 09
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Aliasing problems escalation (WAS: Re: [DragonEgg] [Polly] Should we expect DragonEgg to produce identical LLVM IR for identical GIMPLE?)
...;>
>> By the way, do the GCC optimizers get this, i.e. remove the loads?
>>
>> Ciao, Duncan.
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130210/e33b0d69/attachment.html>
2013 Jan 16
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Aliasing problems escalation (WAS: Re: [DragonEgg] [Polly] Should we expect DragonEgg to produce identical LLVM IR for identical GIMPLE?)
Hi Dmitry,
On 15/01/13 22:22, Dmitry Mikushin wrote:
> Hi Duncan,
>
> You mean - what happens if DragonEgg is invoked with GCC optimization? I tried
> -O3 and -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-ir-optimize=1, but nothing changed.
no, I meant if you run gcc with optimization and don't use dragonegg at all.
If I understand right, your problem is that the LLVM optimizers don't remove