search for: e2e

Renato Golin via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > I'd recommend trying to move any e2e tests into the test-suite and > make it easier to run, and leave specific tests only in the repo (to > guarantee independence of components). That would be a shame. Where is test-suite run right now? Are there bots? How are regressions reported? > The last thing we want is to create d...

...o have bots running them in full CI for multiple targets, yes. > Regressions are reported and fixed. The benchmarks are also followed > by a smaller crowd and regression on those are also fixed (but > slower). How are regressions reported? On llvm-dev? > I'm not proposing to move e2e off to a dark corner, I'm proposing to > have a scaled testing strategy that can ramp up and down as needed, > without upsetting the delicate CI and developer balance. I don't think I quiet understand what you mean. CI is part of development. If tests break we have to fix them, reg...

Folks   I've managed (due to me being fat-fingered that morning) to get a DNS zone in a Samba-4 DNS setup screwed up.   Basically I was trying to add a new A record to an internal domain "e2eservices.co.uk" using the MS administration tools (not the samba-tool CLI). However instead of adding the entry "styx" to the domain, I accidently added "styx.e2eservices.co.uk"; this basically generated a child entry called "uk" under the "e2eservices.co.uk&q...

...able tls = no" in "smb.conf" does not work - we see the same as above.   Does anyone have any ideas? I'm stuck on this.   Further information (just in case someone thinks it might be useful - the global section from our "smb.conf" file:   [global]         workgroup = E2E         realm = AD.CORPORATE.E2E         netbios name = JANUS         server role = active directory domain controller         server services = -dns, -dnsupdate, -winbind, +winbindd         dns forwarder = 217.13.128.17         idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes         idmap config E2E:backend = ad     ...

...> > They're buildbots, exactly like any other. Direct email, llvm-commits, > irc, bugzilla. There is no distinction, broken bots need to be fixed. > > llvm-dev is not the place to report bugs. > > > I'm confused. On the one hand you say you don't want to put e2e tests > > in a dark corner, but here you speculate they could be easily removed. > > Presumably a test was added because there was some failure that other > > tests did not catch. It's true that once a test is fixed it's very > > likely it will never break again. I...

Hello Alan, I had the same issue and I needed to add this line: ldap server require strong auth = no to smb.conf. Then, just restart/reload samba and it should work. On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Alan Hughes <alanhughes at e2eservices.co.uk> wrote: > Last night we updated out Samba-4 AD server to version 4.2.14 usng the > SERNEt packages, running on SLES 12. We have a number of services (mail > services, MANTIS, etc) that access the server via the LDAP interface and in > all cases we discovered that none...

...samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] Samba-4 DNS issue > > Folks > > > I've managed (due to me being fat-fingered that morning) to get a DNS zone > in a Samba-4 DNS setup screwed up. > > > Basically I was trying to add a new A record to an internal domain > "e2eservices.co.uk" using the MS administration tools (not the samba-tool > CLI). However instead of adding the entry "styx" to the domain, I > accidently added "styx.e2eservices.co.uk"; this basically generated a > child entry called "uk" under the "e2es...

...DC didn't exist. Now it exists! Woohoo! "What's the simplest Samba DC I could reasonably use? to dev/test against? All I want is to throw a dozen users and three groups in there". For example, I would love a simple enough setup that I can run in a throwaway VM/container for unit+e2e tests in integration. cheers, m -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com - ask interesting questions ~ http://linkedin.com/in/martinlanghoff - don't be distracted ~ http://github.com/martin-langhoff by shiny stuff

> On Oct 9, 2019, at 16:12, David Greene via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Mehdi AMINI via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > >>> I have a bit of concern about this sort of thing - worrying it'll lead to >>> people being less cautious about writing the more isolated tests. >>> >> >> I have the same

...-0.57057 1.20490 -0.474 0.656 E1D -0.22988 0.98274 -0.234 0.824 E1E -1.17181 1.02918 -1.139 0.306 E2B -0.16775 0.87803 -0.191 0.856 E2C 0.05952 1.12779 0.053 0.960 E2D 0.43077 1.19485 0.361 0.733 E2E 0.40633 0.98289 0.413 0.696 --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 1.004 on 5 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.7622, Adjusted R-squared: 0.3343 F-statistic: 1.781 on...

Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 18:10, David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: >> From other discussion, it sounds like at least some people are open to >> asm tests under clang. I think that should be fine. But there are >> probably other kinds of end-to-end tests that should not live under >> clang. > >

...ndly that ring tones may not sound right after having been encoded to MP3. I've tried using Background but that waits until the sound has finished before the Dial command is executed. Thanks, Peter Spikings This message has been comprehensively scanned for viruses, please visit http://virus.e2e-filter.com/ for details.

...ile at the same time plays a message ("Press 1 to leave a message") and listens for DTMF. I haven't played around yet but the way I read the docs this isn't possible as Thanks, Peter Spikings This message has been comprehensively scanned for viruses, please visit http://virus.e2e-filter.com/ for details.

...d (and option to dial) which make * abandon the other threads and join the caller to the current thread? I'd say it would make things like this a lot easier and * even more flexible ;) Thanks, Peter Spikings This message has been comprehensively scanned for viruses, please visit http://virus.e2e-filter.com/ for details.

...ck with that. Please check with your legal counsel first, you may be shocked as to what the EU and Germany actually require and what penalties you face when you decide to ignore those requirements. For example, are you aware that Germany requires TLS encryption on all email? And has more stringent E2EE requirements on many emails? -- "Let's get back to syntax of procmail and forget the syntax of fools." Don

...nied" on /dev/null from our code in that container (so not from something which libvirt tries to do). Has someone seen something like this before in different environments? Best Regards, Roman [1] https://storage.googleapis.com/kubevirt-prow/pr-logs/pull/kubevirt_kubevirt/2623/pull-kubevirt-e2e-os-3.11.0-crio/1181668456550895616/artifacts/pods/1_kubevirt-test-default_virt-launcher-testvmit2pqrkrlrwbhptcjcs4n67jn6pjqvmtd7pkrp75sjh-compute.log

I run matrix multiplication code with both the approaches o3 at clang and o3 at opt. clang o3 is about 2.97x faster than opt o3. On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:24 AM Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: > is_sorted.cpp > bool is_sorted(int *a, int n) { > > for (int i = 0; i < n - 1; i++) > > if (a[i] > a[i + 1]) > return false; > return

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:21 PM David Greene via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Florian Hahn via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > >> - Performance varies from implementation to implementation. It is > >> difficult to keep tests up-to-date for all possible targets and > >> subtargets. > > > > Could you

About the last question, I'll be reading up on samba-tool. Apologies. A better question is: can I run the DC without an attached DNS server? How little can I get away with running? In my imagination, I should be able to run just the LDAP+Kerberos parts, AIUI that's all I need, skipping DNS, fileserving, winbind, etc; blame this on my view of AD as a quirky LDAP. Again, scoped for my use

...> E1D -0.22988 0.98274 -0.234 0.824 > > E1E -1.17181 1.02918 -1.139 0.306 > > E2B -0.16775 0.87803 -0.191 0.856 > > E2C 0.05952 1.12779 0.053 0.960 > > E2D 0.43077 1.19485 0.361 0.733 > > E2E 0.40633 0.98289 0.413 0.696 > > > > --- > > > > Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 > > Residual standard error: 1.004 on 5 degrees of freedom > > Multiple R-squared: 0.7622,...