search for: e2ac5f9

...every other case I would rather see push_back (and if an explicit constructor call is necessary, an explicit constructor call). My two cents. -Chandler -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161229/e2ac5f9e/attachment.html>

Somewhat unfortunately, we have two discussions here: - Clang-tidy has checks that might improve code -- should we deploy them? If so which? I'll address this in a separate email, and focus this one on: - Should we have coding standards around 'push_back' and 'emplace_back', and if so, what should they say? I think the amount of confusion makes a coding standard useful. As