Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "e247607d".
Did you mean:
1247607
2018 Oct 02
3
[FPEnv] FNEG instruction
...SUB(-0.0, X) transform.
If you can find a transform from one of the quiet-computational operations
to a trapping operation, then we should discuss that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20181002/e247607d/attachment.html>
2018 Oct 01
6
[FPEnv] FNEG instruction
I don't see any controversy for the preliminary requirement of
removing BinaryOperator::isFNeg()
and friends, so start with that?
That work may reveal other potential regressions that we can patch in
advance too.
Other than that, I think there's really only a question of do we want 1 or
both of fneg and fneg_constrained (and if we choose both, then I assume
we'd also add