Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "e1na4nx".
2009 Oct 24
1
Bug#552222: logcheck: dhclient regexes need updating
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.3.3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic ubuntu-patch
As reported in https://launchpad.net/bugs/307847:
recent dhclient includes the ip address it is releasing and renewing.
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dhclient(-2.2.x)?: DHCP(NAK|ACK|OFFER) from [.0-9]{7,15}$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2010 Jan 11
1
Bug#564702: [PATCH] rules suggestions for dhcpcd
Package: logcheck
Severity: wishlist
I'm attaching rules suggestions for dhcpcd as a git patch, and also a
sample from my logs.
Please review the patch (I can fix any issues with it) and include in
logcheck if you like it.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Added-rules-for-dhcpcd.patch
URL:
2010 Jan 11
1
Bug#564693: logcheck: should suggest/recommend nail
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.3.5
Severity: minor
Hi,
reading logcheck source it seems that it requires nail for MAILATTACH to work,
however it is not suggested/recommended.
(JFTR it is debatable if nail is appropriate or something else should be used)
thanks,
filippo
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500,
2010 Jan 21
1
Bug#566107: logcheck-database: with violations.d/logcheck empty most rules in violations.ignore.d look useless
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.3.5
Severity: normal
Hi,
I was having a look at logcheck and why I received a "verification failed:
Temporary failure in name resolution" as a _system_ message.
Turns out that since violations.d/logcheck is empty now, most of the rules in
violations.ignore.d look quite useless, can you confirm?
I suspect that a big part of those rules should be
2009 Sep 06
1
Bug#545318: logcheck-database: please add rule for newgrp messages
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.69
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
when newgrp (part of the package login) is used, I see messages
like this in my syslog:
Aug 27 23:36:16 debian64 newgrp[1975]: user `root' (login `root' on tty1)
switched to group `backup'
Aug 27 19:28:15 srv1 newgrp[10082]: user `root' (login `mazur' on pts/1)
switched to group `backup'
Aug 27