search for: e1na4nx

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "e1na4nx".

2009 Oct 24
1
Bug#552222: logcheck: dhclient regexes need updating
Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.3 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic ubuntu-patch As reported in https://launchpad.net/bugs/307847: recent dhclient includes the ip address it is releasing and renewing. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dhclient(-2.2.x)?: DHCP(NAK|ACK|OFFER) from [.0-9]{7,15}$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2010 Jan 11
1
Bug#564702: [PATCH] rules suggestions for dhcpcd
Package: logcheck Severity: wishlist I'm attaching rules suggestions for dhcpcd as a git patch, and also a sample from my logs. Please review the patch (I can fix any issues with it) and include in logcheck if you like it. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Added-rules-for-dhcpcd.patch URL:
2010 Jan 11
1
Bug#564693: logcheck: should suggest/recommend nail
Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.5 Severity: minor Hi, reading logcheck source it seems that it requires nail for MAILATTACH to work, however it is not suggested/recommended. (JFTR it is debatable if nail is appropriate or something else should be used) thanks, filippo -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500,
2010 Jan 21
1
Bug#566107: logcheck-database: with violations.d/logcheck empty most rules in violations.ignore.d look useless
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.5 Severity: normal Hi, I was having a look at logcheck and why I received a "verification failed: Temporary failure in name resolution" as a _system_ message. Turns out that since violations.d/logcheck is empty now, most of the rules in violations.ignore.d look quite useless, can you confirm? I suspect that a big part of those rules should be
2009 Sep 06
1
Bug#545318: logcheck-database: please add rule for newgrp messages
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.69 Severity: wishlist Hello, when newgrp (part of the package login) is used, I see messages like this in my syslog: Aug 27 23:36:16 debian64 newgrp[1975]: user `root' (login `root' on tty1) switched to group `backup' Aug 27 19:28:15 srv1 newgrp[10082]: user `root' (login `mazur' on pts/1) switched to group `backup' Aug 27