search for: e1813b15

On Jul 21, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: >> I think that the right answer for llvm-gcc at "-O3 -g" is >> (eventually) >> for debug info to be updated where possible but discarded when >> necessary as you describe. For llvm-gcc we really really want the >> non- >> debug related output of the compiler to be identical between

Hi Chris, > > From this observation, I think it might be useful to have some kind of > > global flag that tells transformations whether it is allowed to remove > > debugging code in favour of optimizations. When we start making > > transformation passes debug-info aware, I think the need for something > > like this might increase. > > I think that the right

...oser to making our points of view clear :-) Gr. Matthijs -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080723/e1813b15/attachment.sig>