Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "e0c7bd7e".
2013 Feb 10
2
[LLVMdev] Using the New Attributes Classes
The attached patch creates a skeleton to expand Attributes documentation in the future. It is currently only linked to the index.
Ok to commit?
Joe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130209/e0c7bd7e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: AttributesDoc.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4356 bytes
Desc: AttributesDoc.patch
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130209/e0c7bd7e/attachment.obj>
--...
2013 Feb 09
0
[LLVMdev] Using the New Attributes Classes
Very nice!
Could we get this write-up added to the sphinx docs?
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> Using the New Attributes Classes
>
> Attributes in LLVM have changed in some fundamental ways. It was necessary
> to do
> this to support expanding the attributes to encompass more than a handful
> of
>
2013 Feb 09
3
[LLVMdev] Using the New Attributes Classes
Using the New Attributes Classes
Attributes in LLVM have changed in some fundamental ways. It was necessary to do
this to support expanding the attributes to encompass more than a handful of
attributes --- e.g. command line options. The old way of handling attributes
consisted of representing them as a bit mask of values. This bit mask was stored
in a "list" structure that was reference