Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "e08cc207".
2013 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH v2] X86: disambiguate unqualified btr, bts
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:54:21AM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Jim Grosbach wrote:
> > No. The above rule is absolutely the wrong thing to do, as has been
> > previously noted.
>
> I don't give a shit about whether you think it is "absolutely wrong"
> or not; I did what hpa and the Intel manual outlined. If you have
> some _reason_ not to do
2013 Jul 17
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH v2] X86: disambiguate unqualified btr, bts
...do
with bts and btc should be taken seriously. So i thing that although Linus
is not an LLVM authority, he should be considered an x86 authority.
James.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130717/e08cc207/attachment.html>
2013 Jul 17
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH v2] X86: disambiguate unqualified btr, bts
Jim Grosbach wrote:
> No. The above rule is absolutely the wrong thing to do, as has been
> previously noted.
I don't give a shit about whether you think it is "absolutely wrong"
or not; I did what hpa and the Intel manual outlined. If you have
some _reason_ not to do that, bring it up.
I reported four bugs a few days ago, and the community has shown ZERO
(if not NEGATIVE)