search for: e0325716

...; Of course having the SVG without an artist is already better than > having none of them :). I'm not an artist, so the simplifying is not so easy for me, but its true that that is the really hard part. So I did two full-scale sketches with different texts. http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0325716/LLVM_Bleeding.png http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0325716/LLVM_Inside.png @"the mailing list moderator": my previous (too big) messages with these files are not necessary anymore :-) Andi -- ========================================================================== This email is sig...

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:40:45AM +0200, Sebastian Redl wrote: > I think it would be best to use Mozilla's way for this. If we have any > skilled vector artists, they could try to recreate the image as a vector > graphic (it is not so complex as to prevent this) which would allow for > free scaling. Actually even if you had an SVG source it would be best to simplify the drawing

...vm.org/Logo.html seems perfect for > websites, though. It only lacks the text. What font did you use? I used the default Ubuntu Serif font. This font is used to render the LLVM Homepage in Firefox on my boxes so it speaks LLVM to me. I made a couple of sizes at http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0325716/llvmlogo.html The smaller sizes feature only her head as suggested by Felipe. The smallest size has Helvetica instead of Serif to have a sharper outline of the characters. Andi - -- ========================================================================== This email is signed, for more informati...

...ort vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of the next patches so that you can work on them as you have time. Greetings, Andi - -- ========================================================================== This email is signed, for more information see http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0325716/gpg.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkp9gHUACgkQPiYq0rq7s/AILQCfcuSVw+jSRyX2E2olE4cgbZE7 d0MAnRNj8LtvUJ+/3BpeLj023+5srbVm =5NqX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------- next part -----...

Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Well it does look not too good the text is getting to small in this > case, what do you think of this 128x128 version? Hmm, that one has its left wing cut off, that wreaks havoc on the symmetry. The 136x136 version at http://llvm.org/Logo.html seems perfect for websites, though. It only lacks the text. What font did you use? Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af

...will try to prepare 1 or 2 of > > the next patches so that you can work on them as you have time. And another one. Greetings, Andi - -- ========================================================================== This email is signed, for more information see http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0325716/gpg.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkp9lTUACgkQPiYq0rq7s/A5ZQCglyP2HuapIVTRjakypNmi9Ytd vlUAnRBGijUWx/Py/VKlhxJvLGwHtfS0 =wv5q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------- next part -----...

Hi! Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > Sorry for the lag time... No problem. As long as I know that you get to it sometime its fine for me... > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Andreas > Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >> Hi Daniel! >> >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached >>> patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have >>> with the rest of this patch...

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Andreas Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Andreas >> Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Daniel! >>> >>> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>>> >>>> I merged in my changes to you...

...profile. This would allow me to make the changes very incrementally and that in turn makes it easier to review the changes. Thanks, Andi - -- ========================================================================== This email is signed, for more information see http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0325716/gpg.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkqSYcEACgkQPiYq0rq7s/BdngCeLhuIroTdVE8x0621ILk4F3n1 m1oAniJJOOizDzJlhhQbaDdQ1oureHe3 =6HuI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

...leted llvmprof.out files? > I have compared the revisions now and apart from the passes being > executed faster (according to -time-passes) there is no difference in > the llvm-prof output. > > Andi -- This email is signed, for more information see http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0325716/gpg.html -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: profile.pl URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090723/5984e0ed/attachment.pl>

...repare 1 or 2 of > the next patches so that you can work on them as you have time. As promised, here is the next one. Greetings, Andi - -- ========================================================================== This email is signed, for more information see http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0325716/gpg.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkp9h5sACgkQPiYq0rq7s/BmcgCfRlOfTNMnwpsf70SpQPaqMSh3 RdMAniuAD3HNnaydQbfgqnfHycMdth45 =uDtb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------- next part -----...

Hi, I'm having problem with generating ppc64-assembler code. First I create ppc64-assembler with llc: llc -march=ppc64 gzip.bc -f -o gzip.s Then I try to compile this with a cross-compiler on x86_64-linux to ppc64-linux: .../crosstools/gcc-4.2.4-glibc-2.3.6/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc gzip.s But the compiler gives me gzip.4.s: Assembler messages:

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Andreas Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Is there something wrong with my cross-compiler or is the llc-generated code bad? Most likely the latter, the powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu target is not officially supported by LLVM. In fact there is no support for the 64-bit PowerPC Linux ABI in the PPC backe...

Hi, Tilmann Scheller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Andreas > Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >> Is there something wrong with my cross-compiler or is the llc-generated code bad? > Most likely the latter, the powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu target is not > officially supported by LLVM. In fact there is no support for the > 64-bit PowerPC Linux A...

...and recognition" in programmer circles these days, and the logo > should help to further promote that. Just a little sketch. Andi -- ========================================================================== This email is signed, for more information see http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0325716/gpg.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: LLVM Logo.png Type: image/png Size: 303479 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090730/d6a72a34/attachment.png>

...r > > websites, though. It only lacks the text. What font did you use? > > I used the default Ubuntu Serif font. This font is used to render the > LLVM Homepage in Firefox on my boxes so it speaks LLVM to me. > > I made a couple of sizes at > http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0325716/llvmlogo.html > > The smaller sizes feature only her head as suggested by Felipe. The > smallest size has Helvetica instead of Serif to have a sharper outline > of the characters. Maybe her neck could be part of the small sized image too, something like the attached one but with your t...

Hi Andreas, Sorry for the lag time... On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Andreas Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Hi Daniel! > > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached >> patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have >> with the rest of this patch is that it causes a regr...

Hi! Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Applied as r78477. > > I do have a few comments on the patch, below, but I'll wait to see > where things are going before acting on them. :) > > -- > >> Index: include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfo.h >> =================================================================== > >> + // MissingValue - The value that is returned

...quot;NoData", whereas MissingValue could easily be interpreted as NeverExecuted. I think there should probably be a comment in the doc for this method that the count goes to MissingValue if any edge is missing data. -- Thanks, - Daniel On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Andreas Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) > > Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) > > Okay, here comes the next one. > > I'm tak...

Hi Daniel! Daniel Dunbar wrote: > I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached > patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have > with the rest of this patch is that it causes a regression in > llvm-prof's behavior. I tried running edge profiling on the > MultiSource/Applications/aha benchmark in the llvm test-suite, and >