search for: e019

...000000000000003 (XEN) L2[0x004] = 00000004df8cd067 00000000000007a7 (XEN) L1[0x018] = 00000004df85c061 0000000000000818 (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S (XEN) Domain 4 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#2: (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.2.1-rc1 x86_64 debug=y Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 2 (XEN) RIP: e019:[<00000000c01025e3>] (XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000000286 CONTEXT: guest (XEN) rax: 00000000c08187f0 rbx: 0000000080000000 rcx: 0000000000000004 (XEN) rdx: 00000000dff84063 rsi: 00000000dff84063 rdi: 00000000000f1000 (XEN) rbp: 00000000c08187f0 rsp: 00000000c0651efc r8: 0000000000000...

...from L1 entry 000000002fef3061 for dom49 (XEN) traps.c:437:d49 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap [#6] on VCPU 0 [ec=0000] (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S (XEN) Domain 49 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#7: (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.3.0 x86_64 debug=n Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 7 (XEN) RIP: e019:[<00000000c0212033>] (XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000000282 EM: 1 CONTEXT: pv guest (XEN) rax: 00000000ffffffea rbx: 00000000f56fb000 rcx: 000000002fef3061 (XEN) rdx: 0000000000000000 rsi: 0000000000000006 rdi: 0000000000000000 (XEN) rbp: 000000000002fef3 rsp: 00000000c047df54 r8: 00...

...sed when portaudit > still listed it as a vulnerability. I think it is portaudit problem. > According to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/85093, the > upgrade to 7.0.1 is suppoed to fix the problem, but according to > http://www.freebsd.org/ports/portaudit/02bc9b7c-e019-11d9-a8bd-000cf18bbe54.html > and Adobe's web site at http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/331710.html, > the problem exists in 7.0.1 as well, but is fixed in 7.0.2. > I'm just wondering who is right here, or am I missing something? It looks like you missed the platfom to pay...

...le walk from bffff000: (XEN) L3[0x002] = 000000003d204001 00001204 (XEN) L2[0x1ff] = 0000000000000000 ffffffff (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S (ff1a2c9e) (XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0: (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.3.1 x86_32p debug=n Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 0 (XEN) EIP: e019:[<c0879716>] (XEN) EFLAGS: 00000283 EM: 1 CONTEXT: pv guest (XEN) eax: fffff000 ebx: 00000000 ecx: 00000016 edx: 00000000 (XEN) esi: 00035800 edi: bffff000 ebp: c086efd4 esp: c086ef9c (XEN) cr0: 8005003b cr4: 000006f0 cr3: 3d201000 cr2: bffff000 (XEN) ds: e021 es: e021...

...root at newark13:~# xm dmesg ... (XEN) traps.c:413:d332 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap [#6] on VCPU 0 [ec=0000] (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S (XEN) Domain 332 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0: (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.2.1-rc5 x86_64 debug=y Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 0 (XEN) RIP: e019:[<00000000c0103b55>] (XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000000282 CONTEXT: guest (XEN) rax: 00000000ffffffea rbx: 00000000deadbeef rcx: 00000000deadbeef (XEN) rdx: 00000000deadbeef rsi: 00000000deadbeef rdi: 00000000c06c1000 (XEN) rbp: 00000000c06c0000 rsp: 00000000c0667f08 r8: 0000000000000...

...uto_translated_physmap" Then booting Xen succeeds for Xen-unstable and hangs when booting Linux and reports the following message: (XEN) domain_crash called from mm.c:1783 (XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0: (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.0-unstable Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 0 (XEN) EIP: e019:[<c02ce06a>] (XEN) EFLAGS: 00010287 CONTEXT: guest (XEN) eax: 002f7000 ebx: 00000000 ecx: c02f7fb8 edx: c02f7fbc (XEN) esi: 00000000 edi: c02f9eec ebp: c02c3ff8 esp: c02c3fc0 (XEN) cr0: 8005003b cr3: 001a0000 (XEN) ds: e021 es: e021 fs: 0000 gs: 0000 ss: e021 cs: e01...

...(XEN) Xen trace buffers: disabled (XEN) *** Serial input -> DOM0 (type 'CTRL-a' three times to switch input to Xen). (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S (ff14b5b5) (XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0: (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.0.2-3 Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 0 (XEN) EIP: e019:[<b030c8fc>] (XEN) EFLAGS: 00000282 CONTEXT: guest (XEN) eax: ffffffda ebx: 0000000a ecx: b0301fb4 edx: 00000000 (XEN) esi: b0301f90 edi: b0301fd0 ebp: b0301f84 esp: b03014dc (XEN) cr0: 8005003b cr3: 07085000 (XEN) ds: e021 es: e021 fs: 0000 gs: 0000 ss: e021 cs: e01...

Hello all, please tell me, is it possible (at least theoretically) to circumvent bug 622 [1] by using GRUB instead of /boot/loader to load FreeBSD kernel? Or it is silly idea: even if we bypass /boot/loader we will not be able to run FreeBSD kernel in a HVM-domain on a Intel-based host for some other reason? As far as I know, GRUB can''t load FreeBSD kernel directly, but only can

...nother X2100 using the 2.6.16-18 kernel, which is giving some major problems. During the boot procedure it crashes, saying: (XEN) Scrubbing free RAM (XEN) esi: 00000359 edi: b104b000 ebp: 00359000 esp: b0327eec (XEN) cr0: 8005003b cr3: 073a000 (XEN) ds: e021 es: e021 fs: 0000 gs: 0000 ss: e021 cs: e019 (XEN) Guest stack trace from esp=b0327eec ... (XEN) Domain 0 crashed: rebooting machine in 5 seconds. It is difficult to give more detailed information since this failure isn't logged anywhere. However, if you need more information, we're more than willing to provide it to you. Regards,...

Hi all, a newbie question. I''m trying to install lenny guest image (in an img file) on my lenny Dom0 by following the http://wiki.debian.org/Xen: xm create -c xm-debian.cfg install=true install-mirror=ftp://ftp.XX.debian.org/debian i created the xen-lenny-image.img using dd, format is ext3. disk is defined as (cfg file): disk =

Hi All, I am not very familiar with xen details. Now I am thinking of building two privilged domain(domain 0 not driver domain) at boot time. The other question is that wether it is possible to create another domain 0 by domain-builder running in domain0? Does it make sense when domain 0 is shut down unexpectedly another domain 0 can run at once. Maybe it is absurd. I am looking forwards

2011/7/19 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>: > CC''ing Tim and xen-devel > > On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Jiageng Yu wrote: >> 2011/7/16 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>: >> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Jiageng Yu wrote: >> >> 2011/7/15 Jiageng Yu <yujiageng734@gmail.com>: >> >> > 2011/7/15