Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "dynamic_".
Did you mean:
dynamic
2008 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null
...:
Replaceable:
a C++ program may define a function with this function
signature
that displaces the default version defined by the C++
Standard
library.
Required behavior:
Return a non-null pointer to suitably aligned
storage
(_basic.stc.dynamic_), or else throw a bad_alloc exception.
This
requirement is binding on a replacement version of this function.
These _are_ the defined semantics. You cannot imagine any other
semantic and substitute it. Any program that does, is outside the
scope of the standard and has _no_ constr...
2013 Aug 20
0
sf bug 256 - Virtual functions in destructor
...to the extent that it
has been constructed or destroyed. This is reflected in the rules for
RTTI, exception handling
(?14.4.7), and virtual functions.
It is extremely unwise to rely on details of the order of construction
and destruction, but that
order can be observed by calling virtual functions, dynamic_ cast, or
typeid (?15.4.4) at a point
where the object isn?t complete. For example, if the constructor for
Component in the hierarchy
from ?15.4.2 calls a virtual function, it will invoke a version defined
for Storable or Component,
but not one from Receiver, Transmitter, or Radio. At that point of...
2008 Jul 27
2
Rails Cookbook review
Guys:
Stuck at the mall today, and just had to crack Rails Cookbook, by O''Reily. It
had a recipe for accepting dynamically created forms. The sample output looked
like this (reconstructed):
p params[:my_form]
> ["1-1" => 0, "1-2" => 0, "1-3" => 0, "2-1" => 0, "2-2" => 0,
"2-3" => 0,
2008 May 01
3
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null
On Apr 30, 2008, at 8:51 PM, David Vandevoorde wrote:
>> This isn't safe in general unless you can (tightly) bound "n". You
>> don't want to overflow the stack.
>
> Ah yes, of course. Does LLVM do this for known & small constant n?
We don't do this currently, primarily because I haven't seen a case
where it is a win yet: it would be very easy to
2008 May 01
3
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null
...C++ program may define a function with this function
> signature
> that displaces the default version defined by the C++
> Standard
> library.
> Required behavior:
> Return a non-null pointer to suitably aligned
> storage
> (_basic.stc.dynamic_), or else throw a bad_alloc exception.
> This
> requirement is binding on a replacement version of this function.
>
> These _are_ the defined semantics. You cannot imagine any other
> semantic and substitute it. Any program that does, is outside the
> scope of the standard...