search for: dxx

...through virtual registers, these get assigned to physical registers later. Each virtual register has an assigned register class which is a set of physical registers. So for example on ARM you have a register class containing all the 'SXX' registers and another one containing all the 'DXX' registers, ... But sometimes you want to mix narrow and wide accesses to values. Like loading the 'D0' register but later reading the 'S0' and 'S1' components separately. This is modeled with subregister operands which specify that only parts of a wider value are ac...

...3 20:30:28 +1000 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:57:21 +0000 [klibc] [BUILTIN] Use PRIdMAX instead of %j in printf On 12/03/2012 05:59 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote: > On 12/03/2012 08:42 AM, Roy wrote: >> MSYS libc does not support %j[dXx] format, only %ll[dXx] is supported. >> >> diff --git a/src/bltin/printf.c b/src/bltin/printf.c >> index 893295c..12ce660 100644 >> --- a/src/bltin/printf.c >> +++ b/src/bltin/printf.c >> @@ -319,11 +319,12 @@ mklong(const char *str, const char *ch) >>...

...rg.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:54 +0000 [klibc] dash: [BUILTIN] Use PRIdMAX instead of %j in printf [ dash commit 5464ae7d9e226586b79527cb445d892177b70271 ] On 12/03/2012 05:59 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote: > On 12/03/2012 08:42 AM, Roy wrote: >> MSYS libc does not support %j[dXx] format, only %ll[dXx] is supported. >> >> diff --git a/src/bltin/printf.c b/src/bltin/printf.c >> index 893295c..12ce660 100644 >> --- a/src/bltin/printf.c >> +++ b/src/bltin/printf.c >> @@ -319,11 +319,12 @@ mklong(const char *str, const char *ch) >>...

...ysical registers later. Each > virtual > register has an assigned register class which is a set of physical > registers. > So for example on ARM you have a register class containing all the > 'SXX' > registers and another one containing all the 'DXX' registers, ... > > But sometimes you want to mix narrow and wide accesses to values. > Like loading > the 'D0' register but later reading the 'S0' and 'S1' components > separately. > This is modeled with subregister operands which s...

...get assigned to physical registers later. Each virtual >> register has an assigned register class which is a set of physical >> registers. >> So for example on ARM you have a register class containing all the 'SXX' >> registers and another one containing all the 'DXX' registers, ... >> >> But sometimes you want to mix narrow and wide accesses to values. Like >> loading >> the 'D0' register but later reading the 'S0' and 'S1' components >> separately. >> This is modeled with subregister operands whi...

...s, these get assigned to physical registers later. Each virtual >> register has an assigned register class which is a set of physical registers. >> So for example on ARM you have a register class containing all the 'SXX' >> registers and another one containing all the 'DXX' registers, ... >> >> But sometimes you want to mix narrow and wide accesses to values. Like loading >> the 'D0' register but later reading the 'S0' and 'S1' components separately. >> This is modeled with subregister operands which specify that o...

Hello, We 'll setup asterisk servers on several remote locations atleast 6-7 different locations these are connected to each other through DXX(Digital Cross Connect) ,on larger locations we use PRI/E1 and small locations we use TDM400 may be one or two but lot of IP phones(soft/hard phones),basically we are currently in planning phase to which one is the best for implementing this setup >either we use IAX to connect asterisk servers t...

...'t know if it's because of your efforts or just plain, dumb luck. *Dale Schroeder Technical Issues Del Sol Food Company, Inc.* (979)836-5978*(979) 836-5978* Dustin Davis wrote: >From what I can tell from looking at the logs is any messages that are sent from aol on one of their xxx-dxx.mx.aol.com servers seems to get through fine but if it is sent from a xxx-mxx.mx.aol.com server it gets returned without ever reaching my server. I haven't found anything on google yet and haven't found a forum or contact for aol support. I'll keep checking...Dustin imo-d23.mx...

On X86, the registers AX, EAX and RAX all share the exact same register units. In terms of units, there is no difference between these registers. This makes register units insufficient to track liveness, since live AX does not imply live EAX. Would it make sense to have register units (and lane masks) for the parts of registers that are not individually addressable? -Krzysztof -- Qualcomm

--- src/filearch.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/filearch.c b/src/filearch.c index 5985b73..cbc8372 100644 --- a/src/filearch.c +++ b/src/filearch.c @@ -56,14 +56,16 @@ cleanup_magic_t_free (void *ptr) # endif COMPILE_REGEXP (re_file_elf, - "ELF.*(MSB|LSB).*(?:executable|shared object|relocatable),

...t;Not set> Language : AMA flags : Unknown Transfer mode: open CallingPres : Presentation Allowed, Not Screened Callgroup : 1 Pickupgroup : 1 Mailbox : 101 VM Extension : asterisk LastMsgsSent : 0/3 Call limit : 0 Dynamic : Yes Callerid : "Dxx Gxxx" <604-123-4444> MaxCallBR : 384 kbps Expire : 1861 Insecure : no Nat : RFC3581 ACL : No T38 pt UDPTL : No CanReinvite : No PromiscRedir : No User=Phone : No Video Support: No Trust RPID : No Send RPID : No Subscription...