Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "dw_tag_unspecified_typ".
Did you mean:
dw_tag_unspecified_type
2013 Sep 30
1
[LLVMdev] [patch] Prototype/proof-of-concept for DWARF type units
This isn't a realistic/viable implementation, just a hacked up "can I make
it produce the right output" kind of thing, but while I hammer out a few
more details (like fixing MC to allow multiple sections with the same name
but different comdat groups) I figured I'd throw it out there to have a bit
of a chat about it.
I've tested simple cases of a single type and they seem to
2014 Oct 14
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Less memory and greater maintainability for debug info IR
...= 16647, Count = 988, Ops = 4940, Name = DW_TAG_GNU_template_parameter_pack
Tag = 52, Count = 9933, Ops = 59598, Name = DW_TAG_variable
Tag = 33, Count = 190, Ops = 190, Name = DW_TAG_subrange_type
Tag = 59, Count = 1, Ops = 3, Name = DW_TAG_unspecified_type
Tag = 40, Count = 24731, Ops = 24731, Name = DW_TAG_enumerator
Tag = 21, Count = 354166, Ops = 2833328, Name = DW_TAG_subroutine_type
Tag = 2, Count = 77999, Ops = 623992, Name = DW_TAG_class_type
Tag = 47, Count = 27122, Ops = 108488, Name = DW_...
2015 Feb 20
0
Wine release 1.7.37
...Add stub dll.
xapofx1_4: Add stub dll.
po: Use English names for Programs Files in Lithuanian translation.
x3daudio1_1: Add stub dll.
include: Add msasn1.h.
Bruno Jesus (1):
rsaenh/tests: Fix a copy & paste issue.
David Heidelberger (1):
dbghelp: Implement DW_TAG_unspecified_type.
Erich Hoover (5):
server: Implement socket-specific ioctl() routine.
server: Add socket-side support for the interface change notification object.
server: Add blocked support for SIO_ADDRESS_LIST_CHANGE ioctl().
server: Implement the interface change notification object....
2014 Oct 13
9
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Less memory and greater maintainability for debug info IR
In r219010, I merged integer and string fields into a single header
field. By reducing the number of metadata operands used in debug info,
this saved 2.2GB on an `llvm-lto` bootstrap. I've done some profiling
of DW_TAGs to see what parts of PR17891 and PR17892 to tackle next, and
I've concluded that they will be insufficient.
Instead, I'd like to implement a more aggressive plan,