Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "dw_tag_call_site_paramet".
Did you mean:
dw_tag_call_site_params
2019 Sep 10
2
Dwarf - 5 features in clang and llvm
...,
>
> Support for call-site related DWARF 5 tag/attributes is implemented very late, in the LLVM middle-end.
> Please note that there is also the IR-level flag (DIFlagAllCallsDescribed) that lowers to
> the DW_AT_call_all_calls.
>
> There is also support for call-site-parameter (DW_TAG_call_site_parameter) and the debug entry values
> (DW_OP_entry_value) related DWARF 5 symbols, but it is restricted by the CC1 option ‘-femit-debug-entry-values’,
> since the LLDB is still missing support for that.
Not for too long ;)
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D67410 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67410>...
2019 Sep 10
2
Dwarf - 5 features in clang and llvm
Hello All,
I was working on some dwarf-5 features and debugging optimized code support
in clang and llvm.
Noticed that, DW_TAG_call_site is supported in llvm middle-end. but clang
is not emitting these.
I was hoping, if someone could provide current status of these features and
current status of dwarf-5 features in clang and llvm.
That will be immensely helpful.
Thanks!
Sourabh.
--------------
2019 Sep 11
3
Dwarf - 5 features in clang and llvm
...tag/attributes is implemented
> very late, in the LLVM middle-end.
> >> Please note that there is also the IR-level flag
> (DIFlagAllCallsDescribed) that lowers to
> >> the DW_AT_call_all_calls.
> >>
> >> There is also support for call-site-parameter
> (DW_TAG_call_site_parameter) and the debug entry values
> >> (DW_OP_entry_value) related DWARF 5 symbols, but it is restricted by
> the CC1 option ‘-femit-debug-entry-values’,
> >> since the LLDB is still missing support for that.
> >
> > Not for too long ;)
> >
> > See https://r...