search for: dw_cfa_restor

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "dw_cfa_restor".

Did you mean: dw_cfa_restore
2009 Sep 18
2
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
...frame_debug_cfa_register): New. (dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_restore): New. (dwarf2out_frame_debug): Handle REG_CFA_* notes. (dwarf2out_begin_epilogue): New. (dwarf2out_frame_debug_restore_state): New. (dw_cfi_oprnd1_desc): Handle DW_CFA_remember_state, DW_CFA_restore_state. (output_cfi_directive): Likewise. (convert_cfa_to_fb_loc_list): Likewise. (dw_cfi_oprnd1_desc): Handle DW_CFA_restore. * dwarf2out.h: Update. * emit-rtl.c (try_split): Don't split RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P. (copy_insn_1): Early out for null....
2009 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
...describe the function epilog. If you run dwarfdump --eh-frame on the .o files made with the new compiler, you'll see extra dwarf unwind instructions at the end like: ... DW_CFA_advance_loc4 (64) #<-- advance to near end of function DW_CFA_restore (rbp) DW_CFA_def_cfa (rsp, 8) DW_CFA_nop DW_CFA_nop The linker's conversion to compact unwind "runs" the dwarf unwind info for a function and then records the state at the end. Adding unwind info for the epilog breaks this. In...
2009 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: >> So, when these test cases are run, is the binary linked against /usr/ >> lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? or against some just built libgcc_s. >> 10.5.dylib? >> or against some just build libgcc_s.dylib? If either of the >> latter, then >> if you
2009 Sep 18
4
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: > So, when these test cases are run, is the binary linked against /usr/ > lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? or against some just built libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? > or against some just build libgcc_s.dylib? If either of the latter, then > if you changed the FSF build of libgcc_s for darwin to have the right > magic symbols, then
2009 Sep 18
5
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
...ilog. If you > run dwarfdump --eh-frame on the .o files made with the new compiler, > you'll see extra dwarf unwind instructions at the end like: > > ... > DW_CFA_advance_loc4 (64) #<-- advance to near end of > function > DW_CFA_restore (rbp) > DW_CFA_def_cfa (rsp, 8) > DW_CFA_nop > DW_CFA_nop > > The linker's conversion to compact unwind "runs" the dwarf unwind info > for a function and then records the state at the end. Adding unwind > info for...