Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "dw_".
Did you mean:
do_
2015 Jan 20
2
[LLVMdev] Dropping the DW_ prefix from names in dwarfdump
Hear hear. DW_ adds no readability but AT_/TAG_/OP_/etc do.
Dropping the FORM entirely is fine; I view that as a mechanical encoding thing, not relevant to the informational content. If you're debugging the encoding then it would matter, but for a random string-value attribute it really doesn't matter wh...
2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] Dropping the DW_ prefix from names in dwarfdump
...>> On Jan 19, 2015, at 10:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Frederic is introducing the expression dumping support and in the interests of tersity is skipping the "DW_" in every "DW_OP" (heck, we could even skip the "OP" given the context - nothing else textual can appear there, right?)
>
> I think it always depends on what you are debugging. When I’m interested whether the encoding is correct, I think I’d prefer to have all these...
2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] Dropping the DW_ prefix from names in dwarfdump
Hey guys,
Frederic is introducing the expression dumping support and in the interests
of tersity is skipping the "DW_" in every "DW_OP" (heck, we could even skip
the "OP" given the context - nothing else textual can appear there, right?)
Any thoughts on skipping the "DW_" (maybe even the AT/TAG/FORM too) in the
rest of dwarfdump? (skipping the AT/TAG (FORM would be relatively ea...
2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] Dropping the DW_ prefix from names in dwarfdump
...te:
>
>
>> On Jan 19, 2015, at 10:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Frederic is introducing the expression dumping support and in the interests of tersity is skipping the "DW_" in every "DW_OP" (heck, we could even skip the "OP" given the context - nothing else textual can appear there, right?)
I think it always depends on what you are debugging. When I’m interested whether the encoding is correct, I think I’d prefer to have all these details in...
2017 Apr 04
2
GDB doesn't work with IR-originated debug info
...d got stuck with a GDB error:
(gdb) info functions
> invalid dwarf2 offset 1849950870
>
My module is a DLL built with llc+ld toolchain. Target triple:
'i686-w64-mingw32'.
Looking this offset (1849950870 == 0x6e440296) in dwarfdump output of the
dll gave the following:
0x00000296: DW_TAG_base_type [10]
DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x0000068f] =
"void")
DW_AT_encoding [DW_FORM_data1] (0x00)
DW_AT_byte_size [DW_FORM_data1] (0x00)
....
0x00000cf8: DW_TAG_subprogram [16] *
DW_AT_low_pc [DW...
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...^bId)Zg^1VkCaWz5S+VmF at BszUDVQ!<6A)x)If%xe-x<fTqN%`wGRnacCbWsH;(@
zb9u#9An<c~(c;eHzF46zJSQYY=e&KJf)W1dHYHN{+?SrKryU}F{&RZKVmrM^qW^Px
zQD}ZAy at +r4!ppmIcYquJlU`H_VE#pVv2*v9?{lI768S+u&%58N;|}I*(J5lMr?<v_
z9BjxKFz0Yxo7E<b)TS>tiV<eW>XTw;Rx5}GM&&rDHUg0ogE|x9DW_v(y at y-BF&4p-
z at 16Nlug2wI4YzE8esAk=wi3qa;LzDYn-HPQrUQFkeGI<v$&tZjac#Ku*oMaL%_g=M
zkpd4v(<z-G7qY1}V;S;Zc84moXVxg-8!qa=LG~+zuOr7 at jRu8<oK-5qf;x(gnT19H
zI2sb?c$*6<<XMw{#H!HGn-i1ozTP<#KYmYJ7Qhag18cfw{YEx<y=R!5?$cH#mFu at H
z0h=cZJP*onHDS6`FNy|69XP1LOnlC=md(p`z9*biI&am...