search for: dups

-- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -------------- next part -------------- >From 8f1b06f64807239d4b4c923af4db8626a866ff6f Mon Sep 17

Hello, I'm trying to create my own C code for use within R. While optimizing the code I've noticed that even while only using pointers to get my data to C the time needed still depends on data (vector) size. To test this, I've created an empty C function to which I've send vectors containing various sizes of elements. The time needed for each call is measured and plotted. I would

I´ve several packages for latent class analysis, but I was wondering if there is a package for continuos variables, which allows latent prfile analysis. Thanks for your help in advance, J Toledo _________________________________________________________________ cial-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_1:092 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I am having some difficulty understanding the implication of lazy evaluation mixed with DUP=F in a .Fortran call. In qr.qty from base DUP is not used as an argument so defaults to T. I am calling qr.qty with a very large array and would like to set DUP=F in the .Fortran call so that qr.qty would be defined as copied below. Is there some risk that a variable used as the argument in the original

...[i] <- locs[i] } } keep <- names != "" if (any(keep)) { names <- names[keep] lines <- lines[keep] prev <- nrow(allnames) allnames <- rbind(allnames, data.frame(name = names, filename = basename(f), line = lines)) dups <- which(duplicated(allnames$name)) dups <- dups[dups > prev] if (any(dups)) { origfile <- character(length(dups)) origline <- numeric(length(dups)) for (i in seq_along(dups)) { prev <- which(allnames$name == allnames$name[dups[i...

Just found out [R 0.63, standard -v -n] : > rm(list=ls()) > gc() free total Ncells 96538 200000 Vcells 214008 250000 > hist(runif(50000)) Error: heap memory (1953 Kb) exhausted [needed 390 Kb more] which is a bit astonishing given that I still have room for 214000 double's > u1 <- runif(50000) > u2 <- runif(50000) > gc()

Full_Name: Martin Schlather Version: R version 2.7.0 Under development (unstable) (2007-10-01 r43043) OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (91.3.209.203) Hi, There are 2 dangers with using 'DUP=FALSE' mentioned: * formal arguments * lists Would you also mention a third one, namely that values in R are now only referenced whenever possible and not always copied; hence .C(...,

Hi, I am trying to identify duplicate values in a column in a date frame. The duplicated function identifies the duplicate rows in the data frame but it only does this for the second record, not both records. Is there a way to mark both rows in the data frame as TRUE? dfA$dups<-duplicated(dfA$Value) dfA Site State Value dups 929 VA 73 FALSE 929 VA 73 TRUE 930 VA 76 FALSE 930 VA 76 TRUE 931 VA 74 FALSE 932 VA 75 FALSE But I would like this Site State Value dups 929 VA 73 TRUE 929 VA 73 TRUE 930 VA 76 TRUE 930 VA 76 TRUE 931 VA 74 FALSE 932 VA 75 FALSE Thank you for...

Hi All, I have a 75GB collection of data, including a lot of duplicated files, on a NTFS network drive. I want to backup that data across a DSL link to a Linux host. Currently I use cwrsync on a Windows machine to act as server to the Linux rsync client. I want to avoid transferring duplicated data, as the DSL link is a far more significant factor than computation/disk IO. I can't work

I''ve been monitoring the lists for a while now but didn''t see this problem mentioned in particular: I''ve got a fairly standard desktop system at home, 700gb WD drive, nothing special, with 2 btrfs filesystems and some snapshots. The system runs for days, and I''ve noticed unusual disk activity the other evening - turns out that it''s taking forever to

Hello all, My scripts, which read stdout from ssh, weren't seeing EOF from the remote session.? It was being sent, but lost.? I tracked it down to the following code, in ssh.c, at ssh_session2_open: ??????? if (stdin_null_flag) { ??????????????? in = open(_PATH_DEVNULL, O_RDONLY); ??????? } else { ??????????????? in = dup(STDIN_FILENO); ??????? } ??????? out = dup(STDOUT_FILENO);

Dear all, Is there a reason, why there is no +-operator for aes (i.e. uneval) objects (as there is for themes and gg objects)? I had a couple of cases where such an operator would be useful, for instance to combine the result of aes and aes_string in functions. Any flaws with the following proposition: `+.uneval` <- function(e1, e2) { dup <- names(e1) %in% names(e2) if (any(dup)) {

On Tuesday 06 February 2001 12:36, Dr. Jens Oehlschlägel wrote: > I like the idea. Why don't you call duplicated.matrix() directly in > unique.matrix() and duplicated.data.frame() in unique.data.frame() ? > > Jens Oehlschlägel Good point. I guess I got carried away with using methods (having just gotten the hang of the concept). :-) Anyway, here's a corrected version:

I've been using ssh without it duping stdout and stderr, and had no problems.? I think this change should be made to the master source. WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH SSH RIGHT NOW? It duplicates FILENO_STDOUT and FILENO_STDERR, thus there are two descriptors for each of these files.? When the remote program closes its stdout or stderr, the remote sshd sends the appropriate message to the local

Hi Everyone, I have a piece of C code that uses R_alloc, and so I set DUP=TRUE in the call using ".C". As I understand it this takes a copy of each object passed to my function. If these objects are large then this could be expensive. My question is, if I rewrote the code to use .Call, would I avoid this duplication by using the objects themselves (they are not modified in the code)

There were a few unchecked syscalls in fish.c >From ba8b8b0684a03b6e6fbb939ed7e1cbf5e1000092 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering <meyering at redhat.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:01:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH libguestfs] guestfish: detect a few more failed syscalls * fish/fish.c (issue_command): Detect/diagnose more failed syscalls. --- fish/fish.c | 26

Hi All, I used the following script from the dtrace manual to measure how long a particular process runs on the cpu. Modified it to look at the exact timestamps: [i] sched:::on-cpu { self->ts = timestamp; printf("on=%d\n", self->ts) } sched:::off-cpu /self->ts/ { printf("off=%d\n", timestamp) self->ts = 0; } [/i] The output looks like this: [i]on=24591 off=24603

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 here the failures. Anyway there is a suggested "revision" to use on PowerPC 32bit on Linux ? [...] llvm[0]: ***** Completed Release Build + make check llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/home/llvm/work/src/llvm-2.8/test' Making a new site.exp file... Making LLVM 'lit.site.cfg' file... Making LLVM unittest

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 722 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/19990122/cea14ffd/attachment.pl

Dear R-devel, Duncan Murdoch suggested that I repost this if I don't get a response in a week, so here it is. The tests and the patches were on/against revision 59314, but I don't think that any of the commits since then affected the code in question. While tracking down some hard-to-reproduce bugs in a package I maintain, I stumbled on a behavior change between R 2.15.0 and the current