search for: duportail

On 12/02/15 15:19, duportail wrote: > Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 22:11:03 schreef Rowland Penny: >> On 11/02/15 20:43, duportail wrote: >>> Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 20:18:57 schreef Rowland Penny: >>>> On 11/02/15 20:13, duportail wrote: >>>>> Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 19:5...

Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 20:18:57 schreef Rowland Penny: > On 11/02/15 20:13, duportail wrote: > > Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 19:56:54 schreef Rowland Penny: > >> On 11/02/15 19:25, duportail wrote: > >>> Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 19:09:48 schreef Rowland Penny: > >>>> On 11/02/15 18:29, duportail wrote: > >>>>> ( could...

On 11/02/15 20:43, duportail wrote: > Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 20:18:57 schreef Rowland Penny: >> On 11/02/15 20:13, duportail wrote: >>> Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 19:56:54 schreef Rowland Penny: >>>> On 11/02/15 19:25, duportail wrote: >>>>> Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 19:0...

Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 19:56:54 schreef Rowland Penny: > On 11/02/15 19:25, duportail wrote: > > Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 19:09:48 schreef Rowland Penny: > >> On 11/02/15 18:29, duportail wrote: > >>> ( could not post complete reply, message too large?) > >>> > >>> > >>> I think that's why I have a lot of black s...

On 11/02/15 20:13, duportail wrote: > Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 19:56:54 schreef Rowland Penny: >> On 11/02/15 19:25, duportail wrote: >>> Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 19:09:48 schreef Rowland Penny: >>>> On 11/02/15 18:29, duportail wrote: >>>>> ( could not post complete reply,...

Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 22:11:03 schreef Rowland Penny: > On 11/02/15 20:43, duportail wrote: > > Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 20:18:57 schreef Rowland Penny: > >> On 11/02/15 20:13, duportail wrote: > >>> Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 19:56:54 schreef Rowland Penny: > >>>> On 11/02/15 19:25, duportail wrote: > >>>>> Op woens...

Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 19:09:48 schreef Rowland Penny: > On 11/02/15 18:29, duportail wrote: > > ( could not post complete reply, message too large?) > > > > > > I think that's why I have a lot of black screens on the clients. > > Here debian pdc smb.conf: > > root at fai:~# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf > > # This is the main Samba configurat...

On 11/02/15 19:25, duportail wrote: > Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 19:09:48 schreef Rowland Penny: >> On 11/02/15 18:29, duportail wrote: >>> ( could not post complete reply, message too large?) >>> >>> >>> I think that's why I have a lot of black screens on the clients. >&gt...

( could not post complete reply, message too large?) I think that's why I have a lot of black screens on the clients. Here debian pdc smb.conf: root at fai:~# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too # many!)

On 11/02/15 18:29, duportail wrote: > ( could not post complete reply, message too large?) > > > I think that's why I have a lot of black screens on the clients. > Here debian pdc smb.conf: > root at fai:~# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf > # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the >...

On 11/02/15 15:37, duportail wrote: > We have debian 7 with samba pdc. > > From a joined ubuntu client , i can su for another user but getting other user: > > root at blank005:~# su 59031614949 > 98121524292 at blank005:/root$ > > The numbers are usernames . > > how can this happen? > > in...

We have debian 7 with samba pdc. >From a joined ubuntu client , i can su for another user but getting other user: root at blank005:~# su 59031614949 98121524292 at blank005:/root$ The numbers are usernames . how can this happen? in the samba pcd logs: [2015/02/11 16:10:14.497010, 0] passdb/lookup_sid.c:1684(get_primary_group_sid) Failed to find a Unix account for 92101633919Failed to