search for: duplciated

...uck, I know. --> Not really sure where is the issue, but moved domain users to CN=Users and now join from 4.10.7 to 4.4.5 and seems to work!! Great!! Thanks!!! During join some errors "duplciate value attribute CN=.." but I can find what is duplicated, and some values that appears as duplciated are not showed on RSAT tools, any suggestion how to solve this issues? RFC2307, It seems that join has not added, I'll try to add manually and also add some other config that are not added cert config Thanks Missatge de Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> del dia dl., 9 de set....

...re is the issue, but moved domain users to > > CN=Users and now join from 4.10.7 to 4.4.5 and seems to work!! Great!! > > Thanks!!! > > During join some errors "duplciate value attribute CN=.." but I can > > find what is duplicated, and some values that appears as duplciated > > are not showed on RSAT tools, any suggestion how to solve this > > issues? > > > > > > RFC2307, It seems that join has not added, I'll try to add manually > > and also add some other config that are not added cert config > > > > > > Tha...

...bout user storage issues at least.. Currently my POP users have a max mbox size but that is how much it will store before they "come get it". I ensure they have at least one device set to delete from the server periodically (i.e. 1 week). So users with multiple devices get their mail duplciated on their devices and at least one devices keeps the server emptied so their mbox does not hit any limits. As I understand it, when using IMAP, the user's messages are perpetually stored on the server. So if the user is not moving their messages from their inbox to some other place (e.g. a dif...

...4.4.5 and seems to work!! > > > > Great!! > > > > Thanks!!! > > > > During join some errors "duplciate value attribute CN=.." but I > > > > can > > > > find what is duplicated, and some values that appears as > > > > duplciated > > > > are not showed on RSAT tools, any suggestion how to solve this > > > > issues? > > > > > > > > > > > > RFC2307, It seems that join has not added, I'll try to add > > > > manually > > > > and also add...

...Not really sure where is the issue, but moved domain users to > CN=Users and now join from 4.10.7 to 4.4.5 and seems to work!! Great!! > Thanks!!! > During join some errors "duplciate value attribute CN=.." but I can > find what is duplicated, and some values that appears as duplciated > are not showed on RSAT tools, any suggestion how to solve this > issues? > > > RFC2307, It seems that join has not added, I'll try to add manually > and also add some other config that are not added cert config > > > Thanks > > Missatge de Andrew Bartlett &lt...

...moved domain users to > > > CN=Users and now join from 4.10.7 to 4.4.5 and seems to work!! Great!! > > > Thanks!!! > > > During join some errors "duplciate value attribute CN=.." but I can > > > find what is duplicated, and some values that appears as duplciated > > > are not showed on RSAT tools, any suggestion how to solve this > > > issues? > > > > > > > > > RFC2307, It seems that join has not added, I'll try to add manually > > > and also add some other config that are not added cert config &gt...

....org> writes: > Currently my POP users have a max mbox size but that is how much it > will store before they "come get it". I ensure they have at least one > device set to delete from the server periodically (i.e. 1 week). So > users with multiple devices get their mail duplciated on their devices > and at least one devices keeps the server emptied so their mbox does > not hit any limits. Traditionally, POP was a store and forward protocol. The client would download all the message in INBOX, them empty the mailbox. Nowadays, many POP users configure their clients to...

...act. <youraltrep>_duplicate *must* > do an actual duplication. Returning the object unduplicated when duplicate > is called is going to have all sorts of unintended negative consequences. > R's internals rely on the fact that a SEXP that has been passed to > DUPLICATE has been duplciated and is safe to modify inplace. > > > >> In R an ALTREP object will behave like an environment (pass-by-reference). >> However, if we do something like(pseudo code): >> >> n=100 >> > x=runif(n) >> > alt1=createAltrep(x) >> > alt2=alt1 >&...

Dear R family, I have a question about how to detect some duplicate numeric observations. Suppose that I have two variables dataset. order value 1 0.52 2 0.23 3 0.43 4 0.21 5 0.32 6 0.32 7 0.32 8 0.32 9 0.32 10 0.12 11 0.46 12 0.09 13 0.32 14 0.25 ; Could you help me indicate where the duplicate observations in a row (e.g., 0.32) are? best, moohwan

...tion of of the contract. <youraltrep>_duplicate *must* do an actual duplication. Returning the object unduplicated when duplicate is called is going to have all sorts of unintended negative consequences. R's internals rely on the fact that a SEXP that has been passed to DUPLICATE has been duplciated and is safe to modify inplace. > In R an ALTREP object will behave like an environment (pass-by-reference). > However, if we do something like(pseudo code): > > n=100 > > x=runif(n) > > alt1=createAltrep(x) > > alt2=alt1 > > alt2[1]=10 > > .Internal(insp...

Hello, I have encountered two bugs when using ALTREP APIs. 1. STDVEC_DATAPTR >From RInternal.h file it has a comment: /* ALTREP support */ > void *(STDVEC_DATAPTR)(SEXP x); However, this comment might not be true, the easiest way to verify it is to define a C++ function: void C_testFunc(SEXP a) > { > STDVEC_DATAPTR(a); > } and call it in R via > a=1:10 > >

...rep>_duplicate *must* >> do an actual duplication. Returning the object unduplicated when duplicate >> is called is going to have all sorts of unintended negative consequences. >> R's internals rely on the fact that a SEXP that has been passed to >> DUPLICATE has been duplciated and is safe to modify inplace. >> >> >> >>> In R an ALTREP object will behave like an environment >>> (pass-by-reference). >>> However, if we do something like(pseudo code): >>> >>> n=100 >>> > x=runif(n) >>> > a...

Dear all, I'm trying to get a Brownian bridge kernel (kernelbb) for each combination of two consecutive animal locations (see commands below) and put them, with a loop, inside a list. It works well at the beginning but after 42 runs, it appears the following warning : >Error in seq.default(yli[1], yli[2], by = diff(xg[1:2])) :  >  invalid (to - from)/by in seq(.) I looked at the

I''ve been working on this on the odd occasion, I think it mostly works, or it did last I tried which was a while back. I''m sure it is too hacky in places. My plan was to clean it up on the next test day. I''m mostly just sending this for Wei''s benefit since he is independently looking at adding Debian HVM guest tests for OVMF purposes. Ian. commit

Hi, After reading wiki documentation about join I have tested to join a second dc, but with problems. I need to add a second controller to our AD, and then upgrade existing server (4.4.5) and I have tried to join a new DC 4.10.7 to 4.4.5 server but I receive join errors, attached output wit and without debug: I have executed samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs all seems OK I have made a test