Displaying 20 results from an estimated 18877 matches for "dumpped".
Did you mean:
dumped
2007 Sep 13
1
backing up with dump and DLT
Hi, I have a CentOS 4.1 (with a two hdds RAID 1 using mdadm) running
some database system.... I connected a DLT device on its SCSI interface
(/dev/nst0) in order to make some external backup..... I dump several
filesystems (/, /boot /usr /var /home and others)....so and when I try
to dump manualy for expmple /boot I get this:
[root at Server ~]# dump -0vuf /dev/nst0 /boot
DUMP: Date of this
2018 Nov 03
5
reading old dump backups from 2009
I have and old dump format backup done under fedora 7 which is stored on
disk and has an sha256sum file that indicates there are no data errors
in the backup file.? When I try to read the file with restore under
CentOS 6,? I get the following error:
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 6.10 (Final)
restore tvf u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump Verify tape and initialize maps
Input is from a local
2019 Aug 07
2
Status of the New Pass Manager
On 8/7/19 6:20 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi wrote:
> I basically run "clang
> -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -print-after-all ..."
>
> It's conceivable that something is different in our setup or in clang
> (from opt)... I'll see if I can reproduce it outside our setup.
Does it depend on machine architecture?
I generally use x86...
regards,
Fedor.
>
> Thanks.
2016 Nov 15
2
Missing objects using dump.frames for post-mortem debugging of crashed batch jobs. Bug or gap in documentation?
Martin, thanks for the good news and sorry for wasting your (and others
time) by not doing my homework and query bugzilla first (lesson learned!
).
I have tested the new implementation from R-devel and observe a semantic
difference when playing with the parameters:
# Test script 1
g <- "global"
f <- function(p) {
l <- "local"
dump.frames()
}
2016 Nov 13
2
Missing objects using dump.frames for post-mortem debugging of crashed batch jobs. Bug or gap in documentation?
Dear R friends,
to allow post-mortem debugging In my Rscript based batch jobs I use
tryCatch( <R expression>,
error = function(e)
{
dump.frames(to.file = TRUE)
})
to write the called frames into a dump file.
This is similar to the method recommended in the "Writing R extensions"
manual in section 4.2 Debugging R code (page 96):
2006 Aug 03
2
RE: [Patch][RFC] Support "xm dump" (is Re: Re:[Patch]Enable "sysrq c" handler for domU coredump)
> Hi, Simon
>
> >Two things:
> >
> >1. I''m not convinced ''xm crash'' is needed - ''xm destroy'' will do this
> >(and if you want
> > a dump, do ''xm dump'' followed by ''xm destroy'')
> >
> What do you mean?
> I think we cannot dump with "xm destroy" now.
>
2006 Aug 01
18
[Patch] Enable "sysrq c" handler for domU coredump
Hi,
In the case of linux, crash_kexec() is occured by "sysrq c".
In the case of DomainU on xen, Help is occured by "sysrq c" now.
So The way of dumping DomainU''s memory manualy is nothing.
I fix this issue by the following way.
1. Panic is occured by "sysrq c" on both Domain0 and DomainU.
2. On DomainU, coredump is generated in /var/xen/dump (on Domain0).
2017 Sep 25
5
Errors linking with LLVM 5.0 - dump() missing
Hi,
I am finding that my project that previously successfully built with
versions 3.5 to 4.0 is now failing to link because of missing
implementation for dump(). Errors I get are:
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"llvm::Type::dump() const", referenced from:
ravi::LuaLLVMTypes::dump() in ravi_llvmtypes.cpp.o
dump_content(lua_State*) in ravi_llvmluaapi.cpp.o
2006 Aug 03
3
RE: [Patch][RFC] Support "xm dump" (is Re: Re: [Patch]Enable "sysrq c" handler for domU coredump)
Two things:
1. I''m not convinced ''xm crash'' is needed - ''xm destroy'' will do this
(and if you want
a dump, do ''xm dump'' followed by ''xm destroy'')
2. I don''t see the point of the --noreboot option on ''xm dump'' -- I
think this command
should simply live-dump the specified domain - as
2018 Nov 03
0
reading old dump backups from 2009
>
> restore tvf u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump Verify tape and initialize maps
> Input is from a local file/pipe
> Checksum error 20311110402, inode 0 file (null)
> restore: Tape is not a dump tape
what does 'file' think the file is - i.e. what does
file u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump
say?
>
>
> Here's a log file from when the backup was done back in 2009:
>
>
2014 Aug 31
0
Bug#444000: [ijc@hellion.org.uk: move core dumps to /var/lib/xen/dump]
This should have gone here and not to #706233. Patch will obviously need
rebasing by now...
----- Forwarded message from Ian Campbell <ijc at hellion.org.uk> -----
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:56:49 +0100
From: Ian Campbell <ijc at hellion.org.uk>
To: 706233 at bugs.debian.org
Cc: control at bugs.debian.org
Subject: move core dumps to /var/lib/xen/dump
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9
2018 Feb 24
1
Parsing a bit code file
I am trying to parse LLVM IR from a bit code file. I went through the
following steps.
hello.cpp
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::cout << "Hello world!" << "\n";
return 0;}
dump.cpp
#include <llvm/IR/Module.h>#include <llvm/IRReader/IRReader.h>#include
<llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h>#include <llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h>
using
2013 Aug 16
2
Bug#706233: move core dumps to /var/lib/xen/dump
tags 706233 +patch
thanks
This is somewhat more FHS compliant IMHO.
commit 7d171826bc97bf5f3f2019fc32c1ca85b49de7c9
Author: Ian Campbell <ijc at hellion.org.uk>
Date: Fri Aug 16 14:54:42 2013 +0100
* debian/patches/tools-core-dump-dir.patch: Switch tools to dumping to
/var/log/xen/dump by default.
* debian/xen-utils-common.dirs: Ensure /var/lib/xen/dump is created
*
2018 Nov 23
2
External Snapshots vs Core Dump.
Hi,
I would like to get a clear picture on external snapshots memory dump (
i.e. system-checkpoint) vs dumping the memory of the guest. I have created
external snapshots which produces a disk file and a memory file. I am not
able to use this memory file in any memory analysis tools, for instance
volatility. However, the memory dump taken through "virsh dump" works just
fine with such
2007 Dec 28
2
Help with dump/restore
So I recently installed an Overland Arcvault 12 tape library on a server
to back up /var/log/ and /home. The server is an out-of-box RHEL 5
install, with all packages selected, in an isolated lan, with no package
updates. Also, this is a live server that cannot be brought down for
backups, and some files may be actively in use during the dump - just
gotta live with it.
Since I know EL5 and
2018 Nov 03
1
reading old dump backups from 2009
On 11/3/18 3:26 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
>> restore tvf u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump Verify tape and initialize maps
>> Input is from a local file/pipe
>> Checksum error 20311110402, inode 0 file (null)
>> restore: Tape is not a dump tape
> what does 'file' think the file is - i.e. what does
>
> file u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump
u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump:?? data
2007 Oct 25
2
Cronjob script with date stamp?
I have a cron job that calls a shell script - the script invokes dump.
I'd like to do two things:
- Have the script dump the results of the job to a text file. I tried
this with /path/to/dump my switches -v >> /home/me/dump.log
But that just produced an empty file.
- Have the dump file be date-stamped with the date it was executed. Right
now, I manually edit the script to change
2010 Apr 29
3
dump not evaluating promises?
I'm using the dump command to pass data to WinBUGS/OpenBUGS/JAGS and have run
into a problem.
Here is some R-code:
foo <- array(1:6, dim=c(2,3))
dump('foo', file='dumpdata.R')
dump('foo', file='dumpdata.R', append=TRUE, evaluate=TRUE)
foo2 <- array(c(2,3,5,7,9,7,5,3), dim=c(2,4))
dump('foo2', file='dumpdata.R', append=TRUE)
And here is
2008 Jan 29
3
Dump on remote filesystems?
I have a couple C5 systems I want to back up. My plan is to, one way or
another, back them up to a C5 machine in my office. I have samba
installed on the systems to back up, the machines are mounted on the
system in my office, and a tape library hanging of the system in my
office.
I was hoping to perform a simple /sbin/dump of the remote systems. I put
together a script for another
2017 Sep 25
2
Errors linking with LLVM 5.0 - dump() missing
Hi Martin,
On 25 September 2017 at 20:35, Martin J. O'Riordan <MartinO at theheart.ie> wrote:
> Are you building a Debug or Release version of the compiler?
It seems that in Release builds of LLVM 5.0 the dump() implementation
is absent, although the method is available in the interface. This is
plain wrong in my view. If the dump() has to be removed then it should
not be present