search for: dumpers

Coming from the perl world to ruby, I was wondering if there was anything like data::dumper perl module for ruby/rails? @thing.inspect or dump(@thing) works, but isn''t formatted all as nice. thx :-) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0838 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0838.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 8019a34dc00a2c522b60c8bcfaea4432f3b49b3ea47d308bf789c191d5783b9d perl-XML-Dumper-0.81-8.el6.noarch.rpm x86_64:

I haven''t seen anyone mention this yet. The tail end of the migration process is a call to schema.dump. Our primary keys are uuids and these choke schema.dump on both oracle and postgres. The latter fails silently (skips three tables) while the former complains about the RAW(16) in each of the three tables. Anyone had a similar experience? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, As explained by MiKael Navarro in the following post (http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/55662#new) it seems that there''s a problem with the way the mySQL adapter treats the TIMESTAMP column. Actually, when an SQL schema with for example: created_on TIMESTAMP is dumped into ruby schema, it will lead to: t.column "created_on", :timestamp, :limit => 14 but if we

Hi, http://mcgrewsecurity.com/projects/msramdmp a com32 for dumping RAM... Tru

I don''t know how to install it. Does it support to generate foreign_key_constraint when I execute db_schema_dump? thanks.

Hi there, I am newbie both in Ruby and in Rails. My experience is mostly PHP. In PHP, there is a var_dump($mixed) function that dumps the object $mixed to std_out. This is helpful to see the curent value of a variable, of if it is an object, everything that is in the object. Is there an equivalent methods in RoR? Thanks, Ezra -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi All, While working on some recent patches for x32 support, I ran into an unpleasant limitation the LLVM eco-system has with testing DWARF emission. We currently have several approaches, neither of which is great: 1. llvm-dwarfdump: the best approach when it works. But unfortunately lib/DebugInfo supports only a (small) subset of DWARF. Tricky sections like debug_frame aren't supported. 2.

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > While working on some recent patches for x32 support, I ran into an > unpleasant limitation the LLVM eco-system has with testing DWARF > emission. We currently have several approaches, neither of which is > great: > > 1. llvm-dwarfdump: the best approach when it works. But

Dear All Can you please do me favor and let me know how can I compare two files but not in line-by-line basis on my CentOS server ? I mean say row#1 in file1 has the same data as say row#5 in file2 , but the comm compares them in line-by-line basis that is not intended . It seems that the diff cannot do the job as well . Thank you in advance -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 6:16 PM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Nagaraju > > Mekala via llvm-dev > > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 6:04 AM > > To: jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk > > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List

Hello, I'm using the XS Perl bindings packaged with Debian stable and am interested in implementing my a custom ValueRangeProcessor (using DateTimeX::Easy for human-friendly date parsing) Unfortunately, I'm not sure if it's possible with the add_valuerangeprocessor API via Perl. Reading the XS/*ValueRangeProcessor.xs source files, I'm seeing "process_value_range"

In development and production, I''ve got postgresql constraints that prevent deleting a CaseManager if there is a Client that belongs to that CaseManager. In unit tests...and obviously in my testing db, those restrictions don''t get added. Is it wrong to test for deleting dependent records in unit tests? Craig --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> Why do we need a custom dumping format for the summary? Since

+ other debug info people (Eric & Paul) On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > While working on some recent patches for x32 support, I ran into an > unpleasant limitation the LLVM eco-system has with testing DWARF > emission. We currently have several approaches, neither of which is > great: > > 1.

I have written a python based COFF object file dumper for use in automated testing. I followed the lead for the MachO test cases. Some concerned was expressed with putting a dependency on python into LLVM. I was wondering what way I should go on this one? Aaron has a C++ COFF dumper available that could be used also. - Nathan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

...rrectly (e.g. reference from an inlined-subprogram to its abstract instance) but it didn't seem like the problems were insurmountable. The ultimate design almost certainly requires agreement about what the ELF pieces should look like, and a description in the DWARF spec so that consumers (e.g. dumpers) of the .o files would understand about the fragmented sections. And then the linkers and dumpers have to be modified to implement it all. :-) Even without gc-sections, there is duplicate info to get rid of: everything that ends up in a COMDAT, like template instantiations and inline functions....

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:34 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:28 AM Nagaraju Mekala via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 6:16 PM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > -----Original Message-----

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>wrote: > Eric, David, > > 2013/11/19 Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>: > > Attached is a slightly updated patch. > > (it doesn't include D2222 yet). > > The new version of the patch stopped fitting into the llvmdev 100K limit, > so I've uploaded it to

On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 8:33 AM Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Oh I just see that there were already a bunch of answers. I missed the >> thread, sorry. >> >> So basically my intuitive approach on this is close to what I perceive