Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "dump_coverage".
2017 Mar 07
2
sancov reporting all locations as <invalid>:0
I'm working on a fuzzer using libFuzzer and I wanted to take a look at
how my coverage was doing, as per the instructions here:
http://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html#how-good-is-my-fuzzer
First of all, I suspect the instructions there are out of date, but
passing -dump_coverage=1 to the binary rather than setting ASAN_OPTIONS
generated a .sancov file for me.
However, when I inspect this with the sancov tool, all of the line
numbers it reports are "<invalid>:0". I can list the covered and
uncovered functions successfully, but without locations it's rea...
2017 Mar 07
2
sancov reporting all locations as <invalid>:0
...I'm working on a fuzzer using libFuzzer and I wanted to take a look at
> how my coverage was doing, as per the instructions here:
>
> http://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html#how-good-is-my-fuzzer
>
> First of all, I suspect the instructions there are out of date, but
> passing -dump_coverage=1 to the binary rather than setting ASAN_OPTIONS
> generated a .sancov file for me.
>
> However, when I inspect this with the sancov tool, all of the line
> numbers it reports are "<invalid>:0". I can list the covered and
> uncovered functions successfully, but withou...
2017 Mar 07
2
sancov reporting all locations as <invalid>:0
...I'm working on a fuzzer using libFuzzer and I wanted to take a look at
> how my coverage was doing, as per the instructions here:
>
> http://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html#how-good-is-my-fuzzer
>
> First of all, I suspect the instructions there are out of date, but
> passing -dump_coverage=1 to the binary rather than setting ASAN_OPTIONS
> generated a .sancov file for me.
>
> However, when I inspect this with the sancov tool, all of the line
> numbers it reports are "<invalid>:0". I can list the covered and
> uncovered functions successfully, but withou...